...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation measurements >Evaluation of SAR procedures for D-e determination using single aliquots of quartz from two archaeological sites in South Africa
【24h】

Evaluation of SAR procedures for D-e determination using single aliquots of quartz from two archaeological sites in South Africa

机译:使用来自南非两个考古现场的石英等分试样评估SAR程序进行D-e测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In previous work the conventional SAR procedure has been demonstrated to work well for a large number of samples. Application of the conventional SAR procedure (but with a range of preheat temperatures) to naturally irradiated quartz grains from two different archaeological sites in South Africa showed substantial changes in sensitivity through the measurement cycles; one sample (SIB2) showed no trend in D-e as a function of preheat temperature, showing that the sensitivity correction was appropriate, whereas for the other sample (ZB4) there was a trend that could be related to the growth curve construction, rather than measurement of the natural signal. However, application of a conventional SAR procedure, with a 260 degrees C preheat for 10s and a cut heat at 160 degrees C, to quartz grains that had been bleached and given a laboratory dose, resulted in underestimation of the dose by >= 10%. The effect of raising the cutheat temperature from 160 degrees C was investigated using LM-OSL measurements in order to identify OSL components that are present in addition to the fast component for which SAR was developed. The effects of changing the cutheat temperature and adding a high-temperature optical stimulation between cycles in the SAR procedure were measured for dose recovery tests. The effects of these changes on measurement of D-e values for single aliquots of these two samples are reported. Both modifications improved D-e recovery, and the study emphasizes the importance of carrying out dose recovery tests. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在以前的工作中,传统的SAR程序已被证明对大量样本都能很好地工作。对来自南非两个不同考古地点的自然辐照石英颗粒应用常规SAR程序(但要有一定的预热温度),在整个测量周期中灵敏度都发生了很大变化。一个样品(SIB2)没有显示出De随预热温度变化的趋势,表明灵敏度校正是适当的,而另一样品(ZB4)则存在与生长曲线构造有关的趋势,而不是与测量有关自然信号。但是,将常规SAR程序(已在260摄氏度的预热下10秒钟,在160摄氏度的切割下的热量)应用于已漂白并已提供实验室剂量的石英颗粒,导致剂量低估了== 10% 。使用LM-OSL测量研究了将表热温度从160℃升高的效果,以便识别除了为SAR开发的快速组件之外还存在的OSL组件。在剂量恢复测试中,测量了在SAR程序的各个循环之间改变切热温度和添加高温光学刺激的效果。报告了这些变化对这两个样品的等分试样D-e值测量的影响。两种修饰均改善了D-e的回收率,并且该研究强调了进行剂量回收测试的重要性。 (c)2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号