首页> 外文期刊>Radiation measurements >On methodical problems in estimating geological temperature and time from measurements of fission tracks in apatite
【24h】

On methodical problems in estimating geological temperature and time from measurements of fission tracks in apatite

机译:通过测量磷灰石裂变径迹估算地质温度和时间的方法性问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The results of apatite fission-track modelling are only as accurate as the method, and depend on the assumption that the processes involved in the annealing of fossil tracks over geological times are the same as those responsible for the annealing of induced fission tracks in laboratory experiments. This has hitherto been assumed rather than demonstrated. The present critical discussion identifies a number of methodical problems from an examination of the available data on age standards, borehole samples and samples studied in the framework of geological investigations. These problems are related to low- ( < 60degreesC) and high-temperature ( > 60degreesC) annealing on a geological timescale and to the procedures used for calculating temperature-time paths from the fission-track data. It is concluded that it is not established that the relationship between track length and track density and the appearance of unetchable gaps, observed in laboratory annealing experiments on induced tracks, can be extrapolated to the annealing of fossil tracks on a geological timescale. This in turn casts doubt on the central principle of equivalent time. That such uncertainties still exist is in no small part due to an insufficient understanding of the formation, structure and properties of fission tracks at the atomic scale and to a lack of attention to the details of track revelation. The methodical implications of discrepancies between fission track results and the independent geological evidence are rarely considered. This presents a strong case for the re-involvement of track physicists in fundamental fission track research. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [References: 66]
机译:磷灰石裂变径迹建模的结果仅与该方法一样准确,并且取决于以下假设:在地质时期内化石径迹退火所涉及的过程与实验室实验中诱导裂变径迹的退火过程相同。 。迄今为止,这是假设而不是证明。通过对年龄标准,井眼样品和在地质调查框架内研究的样品的可用数据的检查,当前的关键性讨论确定了许多方法性问题。这些问题与地质时标上的低温退火(<60摄氏度)和高温退火(> 60摄氏度)有关,并且与从裂变径迹数据计算温度-时间路径所使用的程序有关。得出的结论是,在诱导轨道上的实验室退火实验中观察到的轨道长度和轨道密度与不可蚀刻间隙的出现之间的关系是否可以推断为在地质时间尺度上对化石轨道的退火尚无定论。反过来,这使人们对等效时间这一中心原理产生了怀疑。之所以仍然存在这种不确定性,很大程度上是由于对原子尺度的裂变径迹的形成,结构和性质的认识不足,以及对径迹揭示的细节缺乏关注。很少考虑裂变径迹结果与独立地质证据之间差异的方法学含义。这为轨道物理学家重新参与基本裂变轨道研究提供了强有力的证据。 (C)2003 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。 [参考:66]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号