...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation measurements >EURADOS intercomparisons on whole body and extremity dosemeters (2008-2009) - Results and comparison of different dosemeter designs (Conference Paper)
【24h】

EURADOS intercomparisons on whole body and extremity dosemeters (2008-2009) - Results and comparison of different dosemeter designs (Conference Paper)

机译:EURADOS在全身和四肢剂量计上的比对(2008-2009年)-不同剂量计设计的结果和比较(会议论文)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The EURADOS (European Radiation Dosimetry Group) working group (WG2) on Harmonisation of Individual Monitoring in Europe has shown that intercomparisons are fundamental for harmonisation of individual monitoring. As a result of these considerations, EURADOS started to prepare a series of continuous intercomparisons for individual monitoring services (IMS) in Europe. EURADOS has now successfully executed two intercomparison exercises, one for whole body dosemeters (2008) and one for extremity dosemeters (2009). Both exercises were performed without external funding, all costs being covered by the participants' fees. More than 120 (!) different - mainly passive - dosimetry systems were tested from all over Europe until now and the results were analysed and compared. Although scientific studies were not the primary objective of these exercises specific additional information about the tested systems supplied by the participants for statistical analysis allows a detailed analysis of these results with respect to different parameters like dosemeter type, detector material, filter thickness or others design parameters. The influence of such parameters on the response values of the dosemeters is analysed and discussed in this paper. Both energy response as well as directional response for beta and photon radiation are considered. The influence of different design parameters e.g. detector material, is analysed by comparing the frequency distribution of the response values for different dosemeter groups. Pronounced differences for different detector materials (LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and Li_2B _4O_7/CaSO_4) were found. The paper gives a comprehensive overview on the performance of various European dosimetry services and the influence of the dosemeter design on the resulting response values.
机译:欧洲协调个体监测的EURADOS(欧洲辐射剂量学小组)工作组(WG2)表明,相互比较是统一个体监测的基础。基于这些考虑,EURADOS开始为欧洲的个人监控服务(IMS)准备一系列连续的比对。 EURADOS现在已经成功执行了两次比对练习,一次用于全身剂量计(2008年),另一次用于四肢剂量计(2009年)。两次练习都是在没有外部资金的情况下进行的,所有费用均由参与者的费用支付。到现在为止,在欧洲各地测试了超过120(!)种不同的-主要是被动-剂量测定系统,并对结果进行了分析和比较。尽管科学研究不是这些练习的主要目的,但参与者提供的用于统计分析的被测系统的特定附加信息可以针对不同参数(如剂量计类型,检测器材料,过滤器厚度或其他设计参数)对这些结果进行详细分析。本文分析并讨论了这些参数对剂量计响应值的影响。同时考虑了β和光子辐射的能量响应以及方向响应。不同设计参数的影响,例如通过比较不同剂量计组的响应值的频率分布来分析检测器材料。发现了不同检测器材料(LiF:Mg,Ti,LiF:Mg,Cu,P和Li_2B _4O_7 / CaSO_4)的明显差异。本文对各种欧洲剂量学服务的性能以及剂量计设计对所得响应值的影响进行了全面概述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号