首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care clinics of North America >Combined modality therapy of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.
【24h】

Combined modality therapy of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.

机译:早期非小细胞肺癌的联合治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Therapy for locally advanced NSCLC has evolved into a multidisciplinary effort. Patients who are considered for this approach should undergo rigorous testing to accurately stage their disease. Patients with pleural effusions (with rare exception) are not candidates for intensive combined modality therapy. Appropriate patients for combined modality therapy should have a good performance status (generally Zubrod 0 or 1), adequate pulmonary function, absence of significant heart, lung, or other medical diseases, and be appropriate candidates for combination chemotherapy and thoracic surgery or thoracic radiotherapy. Several lessons can be learned from looking broadly at the phase II and phase III combined modality experience. The available data do not support the routine use of postoperative therapy in patients with completely resected disease. Treatment with chemotherapy before surgery or radiation has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with stage III disease. The French phase III trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with early stage disease found an 11-month improvement in overall survival (P = 0.15) and a significant increase in the risk of death for patients with stage I and II disease. The ongoing U.S. intergroup trial (SWOG 9900) and European trials will help to further define the role of chemotherapy in patients with clinical stage IB, II and IIIA NSCLC. Clinical trials should be conducted to compare preoperative chemoradiotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy. The recently completed intergroup 0139 trial (chemoradiation followed by surgery or not) should help to define whether surgery and radiation are required in the management of stage IIIA NSCLC. Finally, further improvement in survival with the use of "newer" cytotoxic agents seems unlikely as phase III trials in metastatic NSCLC have not demonstrated marked superiority over cispiatin-based regimens. Ongoing trials are assessing the incorporation of newer, biologic-based "targeted" therapies. Despite the dismal findings of trials of postoperative therapy, many patients continue to have surgery as their initial treatment followed by postoperative therapy. In contrast, trials with induction treatment seem to offer improved survival. It is time for a true multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Pulmonary physicians, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists should meet before the initiation of treatment to plan the most appropriate therapy for the individual patient.
机译:局部晚期NSCLC的治疗已演变为一项多学科研究。考虑使用这种方法的患者应该接受严格的测试,以准确地分期他们的疾病。胸腔积液患者(极少数例外)不适合接受强化联合治疗。适用于联合治疗的患者应具有良好的表现状态(通常为Zubrod 0或1),足够的肺功能,无明显的心脏,肺或其他医学疾病,并且适合进行化学疗法和胸外科手术或胸放疗的联合治疗。从第二阶段和第三阶段的综合模式经验中广泛观察,可以学到一些教训。现有数据不支持在完全切除的疾病患者中常规使用术后治疗。在III期疾病患者中,在手术或放疗前进行化学治疗已显示出生存获益。法国对早期疾病患者进行诱导化疗的III期临床试验发现,总生存期提高了11个月(P = 0.15),I和II期疾病患者的死亡风险显着增加。正在进行的美国团体间试验(SWOG 9900)和欧洲试验将有助于进一步确定化学疗法在IB,II和IIIA期NSCLC临床患者中的作用。应进行临床试验以比较术前放化疗与术前化疗。最近完成的小组间0139试验(化学放疗后是否进行手术)应有助于确定IIIA期NSCLC是否需要手术和放疗。最后,使用“新型”细胞毒性剂进一步改善生存率似乎不太可能,因为在转移性NSCLC中进行的III期临床试验并未显示出明显优于基于cispiatin的方案。正在进行的试验正在评估新的基于生物学的“靶向”疗法的纳入。尽管术后治疗试验的结果令人沮丧,但许多患者仍继续接受手术作为其初始治疗,随后进行术后治疗。相反,采用诱导治疗的试验似乎可以提高生存率。现在是采用真正的多学科方法治疗局部晚期NSCLC的时候了。肺部医师,胸外科医生,内科肿瘤学家和放射肿瘤学家应在开始治疗之前进行会面,以针对个别患者制定最合适的治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号