...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >Cough Augmentation in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Comparison of Air Stacking via a Resuscitator Bag Versus Mechanical Ventilation
【24h】

Cough Augmentation in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Comparison of Air Stacking via a Resuscitator Bag Versus Mechanical Ventilation

机译:杜兴氏肌营养不良症患者的咳嗽增强:通过复苏袋与机械通气进行空气堆积的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Air stacking improves cough effectiveness in people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and respiratory muscle weakness. However, it is not known whether air stacking is more effective via a resuscitator bag or a home ventilator. METHODS: This prospective randomized study investigated the effect of air stacking via a volume-cycled home ventilator versus via a resuscitator bag in participants with DMD. Maximum insufflation capacity and peak expiratory flow during spontaneous (cough peak flow) and air stacking-assisted cough maneuvers (air stacking-assisted cough peak flow) were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-two adult DMD subjects receiving noninvasive ventilation were included in the study: 27 participants performed air stacking via their home ventilator (home-ventilator group; age = 25.3 +/- 5.1 y; forced vital capacity (FVC) = 809 +/- 555 mL), and 25 participants used a resuscitator bag (resuscitator-bag group; age = 24.7 +/- 5.7 y, FVC = 807 +/- 495 mL). Following a single training session, air stacking could be performed successfully by 89% (home ventilator) and 88% (resuscitator bag) of participants. There were comparable maximum insufflation capacities (1,481 mL for the home-ventilator group vs 1,344 mL for the resuscitator-bag group, P = .33) and mean air stacking-assisted cough peak flow values (199 L/min for the home-ventilator group vs 186 L/min for the resuscitator-bag group, P = .33) between techniques. Air stacking-assisted cough peak flow increased significantly compared with baseline in both groups (mean increase: +51% [home ventilator] vs +49% [resuscitator bag], P < .001), with individual air stacking-assisted cough peak flow improvements ranging from -20 to 245%. CONCLUSIONS: Cough augmentation is an important component of the respiratory management of people with a neuromuscular disorder. No difference in cough effectiveness as measured by air stacking-assisted cough peak flow was found in air stacking via a ventilator compared with via a resuscitator bag. Both methods achieved mean air stacking-assisted cough peak flow values of >160L/min. Provision of an inexpensive resuscitator bag can effectively improve cough capacity, and it is simple to use, which may improve access to respiratory care in people with DMD.
机译:背景:空气堆积可改善患有Duchenne肌营养不良(DMD)和呼吸肌无力的人的咳嗽效果。但是,尚不清楚通过复苏袋或家用呼吸机是否更有效地进行空气堆叠。方法:这项前瞻性随机研究调查了在DMD参与者中,通过容积循环的家用呼吸机与通过复苏袋进行空气堆叠的效果。测量了自发(咳嗽峰值流量)和空气堆积辅助咳嗽动作(空气堆积辅助咳嗽峰值流量)期间的最大吹气能力和呼气峰值流量。结果:52名接受无创通气的成人DMD受试者包括在研究中:27名参与者通过其家用呼吸机进行了空气堆叠(家用呼吸机组;年龄= 25.3 +/- 5.1 y;强迫肺活量(FVC)= 809 + 555毫升)和25名参与者使用了复苏器袋(复苏器袋组;年龄= 24.7 +/- 5.7 y,FVC = 807 +/- 495 mL)。在一次培训之后,参加者有89%(家用呼吸机)和88%(呼吸袋)的参与者可以成功进行空气堆叠。有相当的最大吹气能力(家用呼吸机组为1,481 mL,而复苏器气囊组为1,344 mL,P = 0.33)和平均空气堆积辅助的咳嗽峰值流量值(家用呼吸机为199 L / min)组与复苏袋组的186 L / min相比,P = 0.33)。两组的空气堆积辅助咳嗽峰值流量均比基线显着增加(平均增加:+ 51%[家用呼吸机] vs + 49%[复苏器袋],P <.001),且各个空气堆积辅助咳嗽峰值流量改善幅度从-20到245%。结论:咳嗽加重是神经肌肉疾病患者呼吸管理的重要组成部分。与通过复苏袋相比,通过呼吸机进行的空气堆叠与通过空气堆​​叠辅助的咳嗽峰值流量测量的咳嗽效果没有差异。两种方法均获得了大于160 L / min的空气堆积辅助咳嗽峰值流量平均值。提供便宜的复苏器袋可以有效地改善咳嗽能力,并且使用简单,可以改善DMD患者的呼吸道护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号