...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >Comparison of Alpha 200 and CoughAssist as intermittent positive pressure breathing devices: A bench study
【24h】

Comparison of Alpha 200 and CoughAssist as intermittent positive pressure breathing devices: A bench study

机译:比较作为间歇性正压呼吸器的Alpha 200和CoughAssist:一项基准研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) is used in non-intubated patients to increase lung volume and to enhance coughing. Alpha 200 (Salvia Lifetec, Kronberg, Germany) is a specific IPPB device. CoughAssist (Respironics France, Carquefou, France) is a mechanical insufflator-exsufflator used to remove secretions in patients with inefficient cough. Both can also be used for intubated or tracheotomized patients. We assessed the impact of various artificial airways on the ability of the Alpha 200 and CoughAssist to generate insufflated volume. METHODS: We measured the insufflated volume and pressure at the airway opening in a lung model under 2 conditions of compliance (30 or 60 mL/cm H 2O) at single resistance of 5 cm H 2O/L/s. The devices were used at 2 set pressures: 30 and 40 cm H 2O. The Alpha 200 was set at 2 inflation flows: 0.5 and 1 L/s, whereas CoughAssist was set at its highest value of 10 L/s. Measurements were done without (control) and with different size endotracheal tubes and tracheostomy cannulae. The relationships between insufflated volume and measured pressure were analyzed using linear regressions. RESULTS: The slopes and intercepts of the control relationship between insufflated volume and pressure were significantly greater with Alpha 200 at each set flow than with CoughAssist. As artificial airways were used, the insufflated volume did not differ from the control with CoughAssist, while with Alpha 200 it increased at each flow setting and for all mechanical conditions. The largest differences in insufflated volume between the 2 devices were observed for the largest endotracheal tubes and tracheostomy cannulas and for the lowest inflation flow setting in Alpha 200. These results can be explained in terms of how the devices function, as CoughAssist adapts by increasing flow, while Alpha 200 adapts by increasing inspiratory time. CONCLUSIONS: This bench study has shown that in the presence of artificial airways the value of the insufflated volume generated by the CoughAssist device was significantly lower than that generated by the Alpha 200 device.
机译:背景:间歇性正压呼吸(IPPB)用于非插管患者,以增加肺活量并增强咳嗽。 Alpha 200(Salvia Lifetec,德国克朗贝格)是一种特定的IPPB设备。 CoughAssist(法国Respironics,Carquefou)是一种机械吹入器-吹入器,用于去除咳嗽不佳的患者的分泌物。两者也可用于插管或气管切开的患者。我们评估了各种人工气道对Alpha 200和CoughAssist产生吹入气量的能力的影响。方法:我们在5 cm H 2O / L / s的单阻力下,在2种顺应性条件(30或60 mL / cm H 2O)下,在肺部模型中测量气道开口处的吹入气量和压力。该设备在2个设定压力下使用:30和40 cm H 2O。 Alpha 200设置为2个充气流量:0.5和1 L / s,而CoughAssist设置为10 L / s的最高值。在不使用(对照)且使用不同尺寸的气管插管和气管切开插管的情况下进行测量。使用线性回归分析吹气量与测得压力之间的关系。结果:在每次设定流量下,吹气量和压力之间的控制关系的斜率和截距显着大于CoughAssist。由于使用了人工呼吸道,吹气的体积与使用CoughAssist的对照无差异,而使用Alpha 200的吹气的体积在每种流量设置和所有机械条件下均增加。对于最大的气管插管和气管切开插管以及在Alpha 200中最低的充气流量设置,观察到这2种设备之间的吹入量差异最大。这些结果可以用设备的功能来解释,因为CoughAssist通过增加流量来适应,而Alpha 200通过增加吸气时间来适应。结论:本实验研究表明,在存在人工气道的情况下,CoughAssist设备产生的吹入量的值明显低于Alpha 200设备产生的吹入量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号