首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Diagnostic yield of transbronchial histology needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal lymph node enlargement.
【24h】

Diagnostic yield of transbronchial histology needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal lymph node enlargement.

机译:纵隔淋巴结肿大患者经支气管组织学针穿刺的诊断率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a safe, minimally invasive technique to assess the mediastinal spread of lung cancer. Excellent results have been published by experts. However, little information is available about the diagnostic yield of TBNA with the histology needle in a non-expert center. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic yield of histology TBNA in the workup of suspected lung cancer. METHODS: In a non-university teaching hospital, TBNA data from patients diagnosed with lung cancer between June 1998 and July 2000 were analyzed retrospectively. TBNA had been performed by six different bronchoscopists in patients eligible for surgery with accessible N2 and N3 lymph nodes on computed tomography of the chest during the workup of an undefined mass. Cytology and histology specimens were obtained with the same 19-gauge needle. TBNA results were considered to be diagnostic if cytologic or histologic examination revealed a malignant lesion or non-malignant lymphoid cells. However, TBNA outcome was called non-diagnostic if no representative cells were obtained. RESULTS: From a group of 264 consecutive lung cancer patients, 106 (40%) patients were eligible for TBNA. In 79%, TBNA was diagnostic in cytology and/or histology specimens. Malignancy was demonstrated in 59% (63/106). In only 32/106 patients (30%), a histologic core of tissue could be sampled. In 87.5% of these patients (28/32), TBNA was diagnostic. For cytology only, this number was slightly lower (75%, 56/74). In 12 cases, diagnostic TBNA was verified by mediastinoscopy: these diagnoses were concordant. The sensitivity is 65% if all non-confirmed cases are considered false negative. Ten mediastinoscopies were avoided because TBNA demonstrated contralateral N2 (= N3) disease. The routine use of TBNA during bronchoscopy in suspected N2 disease is a cost-effective procedure, as the total additional costs of TBNA (9,540 EUR) were lower than the costs of 10 avoided mediastinoscopies (15,500 EUR). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of TBNA relied mainly on cytology specimens, despite the use of a histology needle. Representative histology specimens could only be obtained in 28/106 patients (26%). Since TBNA was performed in a general hospital by different bronchoscopists, this procedure is useful in the workup of lung cancer patients with enlarged lymph nodes.
机译:背景:经支气管针吸术(TBNA)是一种安全,微创的技术,可评估肺癌的纵隔扩散。专家发表了出色的成果。但是,关于在非专家中心用组织学针对TBNA的诊断率的信息很少。目的:本研究的目的是评估组织学TBNA在可疑肺癌检查中的诊断率。方法:回顾性分析了一家非大学教学医院的TBNA数据,该数据来自1998年6月至2000年7月诊断为肺癌的患者。 TBNA由六名不同的支气管镜检查医师对符合条件的患者进行了检查,这些患者在不确定的肿块检查过程中在胸部X线计算机断层扫描上可触及N2和N3淋巴结。用相同的19号针头获得细胞学和组织学标本。如果细胞学或组织学检查发现恶性病变或非恶性淋巴样细胞,则TBNA结果被认为是诊断性的。但是,如果未获得代表性细胞,则将TBNA结果称为不可诊断的。结果:在一组连续的264名肺癌患者中,有106名(40%)患者符合TBNA的条件。在79%的患者中,TBNA可用于细胞学和/或组织学标本的诊断。 59%(63/106)证实为恶性肿瘤。仅32/106位患者(30%)可以取样组织的组织学核心。在这些患者中,有87.5%(28/32)的患者诊断为TBNA。仅就细胞学而言,该数字略低(75%,56/74)。在12例中,经纵隔镜检查证实了诊断性TBNA:这些诊断是一致的。如果所有未确诊的病例均被视为假阴性,则敏感性为65%。避免十次纵隔镜检查,因为TBNA表现出对侧N2(= N3)疾病。在疑似N2疾病的支气管镜检查中常规使用TBNA是一种具有成本效益的程序,因为TBNA的总额外费用(9,540欧元)低于10例避免纵隔镜检查的费用(15,500欧元)。没有观察到并发症。结论:尽管使用了组织学针,TBNA的诊断结果仍主要依赖于细胞学标本。代表性的组织学标本只能在28/106位患者中获得(26%)。由于TBNA是由不同的支气管镜师在一家综合医院进行的,因此该程序对淋巴结肿大的肺癌患者的检查很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号