首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA
【24h】

Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA

机译:LCA对回收的废料和原始资源进行总生产的比较环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste and waste glass is a serious concern in Hong Kong, as well as other countries due to their non-combustible and non-putrescible nature, and the running out of disposal outlets. However, mineral wastes derived from C&D activities and waste glass are considered to have potential to be re-used as construction materials, especially as aggregates. In addition, Hong Kong urgently needs alternative and sustainable sources of aggregate, as the local quarry sites for aggregate production are expected to be exhausted soon. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass can be potentially recycled for various engineering applications in Hong Kong, but no study has yet attempted to assess the sustainability by life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques. In order to increase the environmental awareness in the construction industry, assessment of the environmental performance of construction materials by LCA is therefore needed. The present study was conducted to assess and compare the environmental consequences of recycled aggregates production from C&D waste and waste glass, and natural aggregate production from virgin materials by LCA by using case specific and first hand data. The results reveal that compared with natural coarse aggregates, recycled coarse aggregates produced from C&D waste reduce 65% greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission with a saving of 58% non-renewableenergy consumption. Similar environmental benefits are observed for producing recycled fine aggregates from C&D waste. In addition, compared with the production of natural fine aggregates from river sand, producing recycled fine aggregates from waste glass saves 54% energy consumption and reduces 61% GHGs, and 46% SO2 eq emissions. According to the IMPACT 2002+ Method, significant health, resource, climate change and ecosystem damages can be saved in producing recycled aggregates from both waste materials compared to producing and importing aggregates from virgin sources. This is the first ever LCA study on producing recycled aggregates from waste glass. Therefore, it can be concluded that substantial net environmental benefits can be realized for producing recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass. The results can provide a guidance to maximize C&D waste and waste glass recycling, resourceful treatment of wastes and conserve natural resources. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:香港及其他国家/地区的拆建废玻璃和废玻璃的管理受到严重关注,因为它们的性质不易燃,不可处理,而且处置网点也用光了。但是,来自拆建活动和废玻璃的矿物废物被认为有潜力被重新用作建筑材料,尤其是骨料。此外,香港迫切需要替代的和可持续的骨料来源,因为预计本地的采石场将用于骨料生产。许多实验研究表明,拆建废料和废玻璃的回收骨料可以在香港用于各种工程应用,但尚未进行任何研究来通过生命周期评估(LCA)技术评估可持续性。为了提高建筑行业的环保意识,因此需要通过LCA评估建筑材料的环保性能。本研究旨在通过案例分析和第一手数据评估和比较C&D废料和废玻璃的再生骨料生产以及LCA天然材料的天然骨料生产对环境的影响。结果表明,与天然粗骨料相比,由拆建废物产生的再生粗骨料减少了65%的温室气体排放,节省了58%的不可再生能源消耗。从拆建废料中生产回收的细骨料,可以观察到类似的环境效益。此外,与用河砂生产天然细骨料相比,用废玻璃生产再生细骨料可节省54%的能源消耗,减少61%的温室气体和46%的SO2当量排放。根据IMPACT 2002+方法,与从原始来源生产和进口骨料相比,从两种废料生产再生骨料可以节省大量的健康,资源,气候变化和生态系统损害。这是有关废玻璃生产再生骨料的LCA的首次研究。因此,可以得出结论,用拆建废料和废玻璃生产再生骨料可以实现可观的净环境效益。结果可为最大程度地减少拆建废料和废玻璃回收利用,废物的资源化处理以及节约自然资源提供指导。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号