首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard
【24h】

Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard

机译:将木结构公寓改建为被动式房屋标准的生命周期主要能量含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Here we analyze the life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a four-storey wood-frame apartment building to the energy use of a passive house. The initial building has an annual final energy use of 110kWh/m~2 for space and tap water heating. We model improved thermal envelope insulation, ventilation heat recovery, and efficient hot water taps. We follow the building life cycle to analyze the primary energy reduction achieved by the retrofitting, considering different energy supply systems. Significantly greater life cycle primary energy reduction is achieved when an electric resistance heated building is retrofitted than when a district heated building is retrofitted. The primary energy use for material production increases when the operating energy is reduced but this increase is more than offset by greater primary energy reduction during the operation phase of the building, resulting in significant life cycle primary energy savings. Still, the type of heat supply system has greater impact on primary energy use than the final heat reduction measures.
机译:在这里,我们分析了将四层木结构公寓建筑改建为被动式房屋的能耗的生命周期主要能源含义。最初的建筑物每年用于空间和自来水加热的最终能源消耗为110kWh / m〜2。我们对改进的保温外壳隔热,通风热回收和高效热水龙头进行建模。我们考虑建筑物的生命周期,以考虑不同的能源供应系统,分析通过改造实现的一次能源减少。与对区域供热的建筑物进行改造相比,对电阻供热的建筑物进行改造的过程显着提高了生命周期的一次能源消耗。降低运行能量后,材料生产中的一次能源使用量会增加,但这种增加不能被建筑物运行期间更大程度的一次能源消耗所抵消,从而可以显着节省生命周期内的一次能源。尽管如此,供热系统的类型对最终能源使用的影响要大于最终的减少热量的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号