首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy versus combination treatment with photodynamic therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to causes other than age-related macular degeneration.
【24h】

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy versus combination treatment with photodynamic therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to causes other than age-related macular degeneration.

机译:抗血管内皮生长因子单一疗法与光动力疗法的联合治疗可治疗继发于除年龄相关性黄斑变性以外的其他原因引起的小凹下脉络膜新生血管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and retreatment rates of monotherapy with intravitreal bevacizumab versus combination with photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to causes other than age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Seventeen patients received intravitreal bevacizumab, and 6 patients underwent intravitreal bevacizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy within 3 days. Additional bevacizumab was administrated if there was persistent fluorescein leakage or subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The mean change in visual acuity was vision gain of 1.7 lines in the monotherapy group compared with 2.8 lines in the combination therapy group at 12-month follow-up (P = 0.45). At 12 months, 93% in the monotherapy group and 100% in the combination group lost <2 lines of vision (P = 1.0); 36% gained >3 lines of vision in the monotherapy compared with 60% in the combination therapy group (P = 0.60). The monotherapy group received a mean of 4.8 reinjections, while the combination group received 2.6 reinjections over 12 months (P = 0.11). Subgroup analysis of cases of choroidal neovascularization caused by pathologic myopia demonstrated a mean change in visual acuity of vision gain of +2.0 lines in the monotherapy group versus +2.3 lines in the combination therapy group (P = 0.82) and a mean of 7.2 reinjections versus 2 in monotherapy and combination group, respectively (P = 0.0498) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients had stabilization or improvement in vision in both treatment groups. Combination therapy with bevacizumab plus photodynamic therapy showed lower retreatment rates in patients with myopia. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
机译:目的:比较玻璃体腔内贝伐单抗单药疗法与光动力疗法联合治疗除年龄相关性黄斑变性以外的继发性脉络膜新生血管的视觉效果和再治疗率。方法:17例患者接受玻璃体内贝伐单抗治疗,6例患者在3天内接受玻璃体内贝伐单抗联合维替泊芬光动力疗法治疗。如果在光学相干断层扫描中持续出现荧光素渗漏或视网膜下积液,则需另外给予贝伐单抗。结果:在12个月的随访中,单药治疗组平均视力变化为1.7线,而联合治疗组为2.8线(P = 0.45)。在12个月时,单药治疗组93%的患者和联合治疗组100%的患者失去了<2个视线(P = 1.0);在单一疗法中,有36%的人获得了大于3的视线,而在联合疗法组中则为60%(P = 0.60)。单药治疗组平均接受4.8次再注射,而联合治疗组在12个月内接受2.6次再注射(P = 0.11)。对由病理性近视引起的脉络膜新生血管病例进行的亚组分析表明,单药治疗组的视力平均视力变化为+2.0线,联合治疗组为+2.3线(P = 0.82),再注射的平均视力为7.2单药治疗和联合治疗组在12个月时分别为2(P = 0.0498)。结论:两个治疗组中大多数患者的视力稳定或改善。贝伐单抗联合光动力疗法的联合治疗显示近视患者的再治疗率较低。随机临床试验对于确认这些发现是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号