首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Systemic safety of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: Meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

Systemic safety of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:雷珠单抗对糖尿病性黄斑水肿的系统安全性:随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate systemic safety of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed. Eligible studies were randomized trials on ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with observation at least 6 months and ≥80% completion rate that reported systemic adverse events of cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, vascular death, and overall mortality. The numbers of adverse events were compared between patients treated with ranibizumab and those without. Furthermore, dose-dependent effect of ranibizumab was estimated for overall mortality through Poisson meta-regression. Results: Six trials with 2,459 patients were included. All trials had exclusion criteria on systemic vascular conditions for enrollment. Risk ratio for cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, vascular death, and overall mortality were 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.73; P = 0.57), 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.80; P = 0.78), 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-2.86; P = 0.53), and 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-4.73; P = 0.16), respectively. Poisson regression model showed a significant dose-dependent increase in overall mortality in the largest randomized trial using monthly ranibizumab (P = 0.04). However, the significance disappeared (P = 0.133) when pooled with other studies using ranibizumab on pro re nata basis. Conclusion: Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema is considered safe when the patients are carefully selected based on systemic vascular conditions and it is used on pro re nata basis. Further evaluation is necessary on more intensive use or on high-risk patients.
机译:目的:评估兰尼单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的全身安全性。方法:系统评价了MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统和ClinicalTrials.gov。符合条件的研究是兰尼单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的随机试验,观察至少6个月且完成率≥80%,报道脑血管意外,心肌梗塞,血管死亡和总死亡率的全身不良事件。比较了接受兰尼单抗治疗的患者和未接受兰尼单抗治疗的患者的不良事件数量。此外,雷尼珠单抗的剂量依赖性作用通过泊松元回归估计总体死亡率。结果:包括6项试验,共2459名患者。所有试验均针对全身血管疾病纳入了排除标准。脑血管意外,心肌梗死,血管死亡和总死亡率的风险比是0.80(95%置信区间,0.37-1.73; P = 0.57),0.91(95%置信区间,0.46-1.80; P = 0.78),1.29( 95%置信区间0.58-2.86; P = 0.53)和1.92(95%置信区间0.78-4.73; P = 0.16)。 Poisson回归模型显示,在使用每月兰尼单抗的最大随机试验中,总死亡率有明显的剂量依赖性增加(P = 0.04)。然而,当与其他使用兰尼单抗的研究合并时,其显着性消失(P = 0.133)。结论:雷尼单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿被认为是安全的,要根据全身血管状况精心选择患者,并以前列腺素为基础使用。对于更频繁使用或高危患者,需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号