首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Comparison of digital fundus photographic and echographic measurements for maximal linear dimension from eyes with choroidal melanoma.
【24h】

Comparison of digital fundus photographic and echographic measurements for maximal linear dimension from eyes with choroidal melanoma.

机译:脉络膜黑色素瘤眼睛的最大线性尺寸的数字眼底照相和回波照相测量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Accurate assessment of tumor size is crucial in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. Digital fundus photographic systems can create a montage that clearly documents the tumor margins. These images can be used to measure tumor maximal linear dimension (MLD). This study evaluates the potential value of a digital imaging system compared with echography in measuring the MLD of choroidal melanoma. METHODS: Echographic measurements were performed in a standardized fashion following Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) methods. For photographic measurements, the tumor margin was outlined with an electronic pen and the MLD were calculated by software (ANKA-ProView, Topcon Medical Systems, Paramus, NJ). RESULTS: The mean MLD before I-125 brachytherapy was 9.32 mm by echography and 10.57 mm by digital photography analysis. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The 2 measurements of MLD agreed within 1.1 mm for 11 eyes (52%) and 2.2 mm for 20 eyes (95%). Digital photographic analysis estimated a larger MLD in 19 of the 21 eyes compared with echography. CONCLUSION: This discrepancy likely results from the photographic measurement more accurately assessing the flat portion of the tumor. Digital photographic analysis may allow clinicians to determine the MLD of tumors more accurately than echography. This could increase the rate of successful treatment with brachytherapy.
机译:目的:准确评估肿瘤的大小对于脉络膜黑色素瘤的治疗至关重要。数字式眼底照相系统可以创建蒙太奇,清楚地记录肿瘤的边缘。这些图像可用于测量肿瘤最大线性尺寸(MLD)。这项研究评估了与超声检查相比,数字成像系统在测量脉络膜黑色素瘤的MLD中的潜在价值。方法:按照协作式眼黑素瘤研究(COMS)方法,以标准化方式进行超声描记术测量。对于照相测量,用电子笔勾勒出肿瘤边缘,并通过软件(ANKA-ProView,Topcon Medical Systems,Paramus,NJ)计算MLD。结果:I-125近距离放射治疗前的平均MLD(超声检查)为9.32 mm,数字摄影分析为10.57 mm。这种差异具有统计学意义(P <0.001)。 MLD的2次测量结果一致,11眼(52%)为1.1毫米,20眼(95%)为2.2毫米。数字照片分析估计,与超声检查相比,在21只眼睛中有19只眼睛的MLD更大。结论:这种差异可能是由于照相测量更准确地评估了肿瘤的平坦部分而导致的。数字照片分析可以使临床医生比超声检查更准确地确定肿瘤的MLD。这可以提高近距离放射治疗的成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号