首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Validation of clear-sky radiances over oceans simulated with MODTRAN4.2 and global NCEP GDAS fields against nighttime NOAA15-18 and MetOp-A AVHRR data
【24h】

Validation of clear-sky radiances over oceans simulated with MODTRAN4.2 and global NCEP GDAS fields against nighttime NOAA15-18 and MetOp-A AVHRR data

机译:根据夜间NOAA15-18和MetOp-A AVHRR数据,使用MODTRAN4.2和全球NCEP GDAS场对海洋上的晴空辐射进行验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An accurate and globally representative forward radiative transfer model (RTM) is needed to explore improvements in sea surface temperature (SST) retrievals from spaceborne infrared observations. This study evaluates the biases in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) brightness temperatures (BT) modeled with the moderate resolution transmission (MODTRAN4.2) band RTM, bounded by a Fresnel's reflective flat sea surface. This model is used to simulate global clear-sky Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) nighttime BTs from NOAA-15 through 18 and MetOp-A platforms for one full day of IS February 2007. Inputs to RTM (SST fields and vertical profiles of atmospheric relative humidity, temperature, pressure, and geopotential height) are specified from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction's (NCEP) Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) data. Model BTs in AVHRR channels 3B (3.7 mu m), 4 (11 mu m), and 5 (12 mu m) are then compared with their respective measured counterparts, available in the NESDIS operational SST files. Ideally, the RTM should match the observations, but in fact, the modeled BTs are biased high with respect to the AVHRR BTs. The "Model minus Observation" (M - O) bias ranges from about 0 to 2 K, depending upon spectral band, view zenith angle, and sea and atmosphere state at the retrieval point. The bias asymptotically decreases towards confidently clear-sky conditions, but it never vanishes and invariably shows channel-specific dependencies on view zenith angle and geophysical conditions (e.g., column water vapor and sea-air temperature difference). Fuller exploration of the potential of the current RTM (e.g., adding global vertical aerosol profiles) or improvements to its input (NCEP SST and atmospheric profiles) may reduce this bias, but they cannot fully reconcile its spectral and angular structure. The fact that the M-O biases are closely reproducible for five AVHRR sensors flown onboard different platforms adds confidence in the validation approach employed in this study. We emphasize the need for establishing a globally adequate forward RTM for the use in SST modeling and retrievals. A first test of the RTM adequacy is its ability, when used in conjunction with the global fields from the numerical weather prediction models, to reproduce the TOA clear-sky radiances measured by satellite sensors. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:需要一个准确且具有全球代表性的正向辐射传递模型(RTM),以探索从星载红外观测中获取的海表温度(SST)检索的改进。这项研究评估了以中等分辨率透射(MODTRAN4.2)波段RTM为模型的大气顶(TOA)亮度温度(BT)的偏差,该偏差以菲涅耳的反射性平坦海面为边界。该模型用于在2007年2月IS整整一天的时间内,模拟从NOAA-15到18和MetOp-A平台的全球晴空先进的超高分辨率辐射计(AVHRR)夜间BT。RTM(SST字段和大气相对湿度,温度,压力和地势高度)是由美国国家环境预测中心(NCEP)的全球数据同化系统(GDAS)数据指定的。然后,将AVHRR通道3B(3.7微米),4(11微米)和5(12微米)中的BT模型与它们各自测量的对应物进行比较,可在NESDIS SST文件中找到它们。理想情况下,RTM应该与观测值匹配,但实际上,相对于AVHRR BT,建模的BT偏高。 “模型减去观测值”(M-O)的偏差范围从0到2 K,具体取决于光谱带,天顶角以及取回点的海洋和大气状态。偏向渐渐向着确定的晴空条件减小,但是它永远不会消失,并且始终显示通道对视天顶角和地球物理条件(例如,柱水蒸气和海水温度差)的依赖性。对当前RTM的潜力进行更充分的探索(例如添加全球垂直气溶胶剖面)或对其输入进行改进(NCEP SST和大气剖面)可能会减少这种偏差,但它们无法完全协调其光谱和角度结构。对于在不同平台上飞行的五个AVHRR传感器而言,M-O偏差几乎可以重现,这一事实增加了对该研究采用的验证方法的信心。我们强调有必要建立一个在SST建模和检索中使用的全局适当的前向RTM。 RTM充足性的第一个测试是其与数值天气预报模型的全球范围结合使用时,能够再现由卫星传感器测得的TOA晴空辐射的能力。 (C)2008 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号