...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Radiation therapy with unflattened photon beams: dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms.
【24h】

Radiation therapy with unflattened photon beams: dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms.

机译:使用未展平的光子束进行放射治疗:高级剂量计算算法的剂量精确度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms for flattened (FF) and unflattened (FFF) photon beams. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared the enhanced collapsed cone (eCC) algorithm implemented in OncentraMasterplan and the XVMC (MC) code in Monaco. Test plans were created for 10MV FF and FFF beams. Single beam tests were delivered to radiochromic films positioned within a solid water phantom and evaluated with 1D gamma-index analysis. Conformal plans were verified with ion chambers in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. IMRT plans were applied to the Delta4 system and evaluated with gamma-criteria of 3% and 3mm. RESULTS: 1D gamma-index evaluation revealed significantly lower (p<0.05) average gamma(mean)-values of 0.46+/-0.22 for MC calculated FFF profiles compared to average values of 0.53+/-0.27 detected for FF beams. Respective values for eCC were 0.42+/-0.27/0.38+/-0.26 (FF/FFF). When considering off-axis profiles separately, we found significantly reduced average gamma(mean)-values for FFF and both algorithms (MC: 0.55+/-24 vs. 0.45+/-0.21, eCC: 0.41+/-0.24 vs. 0.35+/-0.22). No significant differences were detected on-axis. Absolute dosimetry in the anthropomorphic phantom revealed superior results for MC based dose calculation, with mean deviations of 0.8+/-0.8/0.0+/-1.0% compared to -0.1+/-1.7/-0.5+/-0.1.7% (FF/FFF) for the eCC algorithm. IMRT plans showed similar results for both linac modes. CONCLUSIONS: The dose calculation accuracy for unflattened beams was found to be at least as high as for flattened beams. The slightly improved dose calculation accuracy observed for off-axis profiles for single FFF beams did not directly translate into better verification results for composite IMRT plans.
机译:目的:比较先进剂量计算算法对平坦(FF)和未平坦(FFF)光子束的剂量学准确性。材料与方法:我们比较了在OnentraMasterplan中实现的增强型折叠锥体(eCC)算法和在摩纳哥的XVMC(MC)代码。为10MV FF和FFF光束创建了测试计划。将单光束测试传递到位于固体水体模内的放射致变色膜上,并通过一维伽玛指数分析进行评估。在拟人化的胸部模型中用离子室验证了保形计划。 IMRT计划已应用于Delta4系统,并使用3%和3mm的伽马标准进行了评估。结果:一维伽玛指数评估显示,与通过FF光束检测到的平均值0.53 +/- 0.27的平均值相比,MC计算的FFF轮廓的平均伽玛(平均值)值显着更低(p <0.05)为0.46 +/- 0.22。 eCC的分别值为0.42 +/- 0.27 / 0.38 +/- 0.26(FF / FFF)。当分别考虑离轴轮廓时,我们发现FFF和两种算法的平均伽玛值均显着降低(MC:0.55 +/- 24与0.45 +/- 0.21,eCC:0.41 +/- 0.24与0.35 +/- 0.22)。在轴上未检测到显着差异。拟人幻影中的绝对剂量法显示了基于MC的剂量计算的优异结果,平均偏差为0.8 +/- 0.8 / 0.0 +/- 1.0%,而-0.1 +/- 1.7 / -0.5 +/- 0.1.7%( FF / FFF)。 IMRT计划对两种直线加速器模式都显示了相似的结果。结论:未平坦光束的剂量计算精度至少与平坦光束相同。对于单个FFF光束离轴剖面观察到的剂量计算精度略有提高,并没有直接转化为复合IMRT计划的更好的验证结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号