...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Erratum: Outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung tumours: A systematic review (Radiotherapy and Oncology (2013) 106 (276-282))
【24h】

Erratum: Outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung tumours: A systematic review (Radiotherapy and Oncology (2013) 106 (276-282))

机译:勘误:立体定向消融放射疗法治疗中心性肺肿瘤的结果:系统评价(放射治疗与肿瘤学(2013)106(276-282))

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The authors regret that there are some discrepancies in the data they cited from the paper by Milano et al. titled "Central thoracic lesions treated with hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy". They mistakenly interpreted the modal dose fractionation used in this report as being '5 fractions of 10 Gy', when it was actually '10 fractions of 5 Gy'.The authors would like to make the following corrections to the manuscript: Table 1: Modal fractionation for Milano should read 50/10 (not 50/5); Table 3: Modal BED3 for Milano should read 133 (not 217); Results: The partial sentence starting page 279 should instead read'.. .tumours receiving a BED3 ^210 Gy, the rate of treatment-related death was 3.4% (10/296), while it was 1.0% (2/204) when the SABR schedule had a BED3 <210Gy (calculation excludes results from Milano et al. where all 4 deaths occurred in patients with Stage II-III NSCLC, 2 of whom had repeated courses of SABR).'; Discussion: The following sentence is incorrect and should be disregarded, 'Of these, Milano et al. reported only treatment-related deaths (n = 2) when utilzing 50 Gy in 5 fractions, both of which occurred in patients receiving SABR for node-positive NSCLC. This error does not alter the conclusions of the study, but more accurately reflects the source data that were presented.
机译:作者感到遗憾的是,他们从Milano等人的论文引用的数据中存在一些差异。标题为“用普通分割立体定向放射治疗的中央胸腔病变”。他们错误地解释了本报告中使用的模态剂量分数为“ 5 Gy的5分数”,而实际上是“ 5 Gy的10分数”。作者希望对手稿进行以下更正:表1:模态Milano的分馏应为50/10(而不是50/5);表3:Milano的BED3模式应显示为133(而不是217);结果:从279页开始的部分句子应该改为“ ...接受BED3 ^ 210 Gy的肿瘤,与治疗相关的死亡率是3.4%(10/296),而在1.0%(2/204)时是1.0%(2/204)”。 SABR计划的BED3 <210Gy(计算结果不包括Milano等人的结果,其中所有4例死亡均发生在II-III期NSCLC患者中,其中2例重复了SABR疗程)。讨论:以下句子是不正确的,应忽略不计,“其中,Milano等。报告仅在5个分数中使用50 Gy时仅发生与治疗相关的死亡(n = 2),这两者均发生在接受SABR结节阳性NSCLC的患者中。该错误不会改变研究的结论,但是可以更准确地反映所提供的源数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号