首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index
【24h】

Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index

机译:机载离散返回LIDAR数据在垂直冠层覆盖,角冠层闭合和叶面积指数的估计中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Remote sensing of forest canopy cover has been widely studied recently, but little attention has been paid to the quality of field validation data. Ecological literature has two different coverage metrics. Vertical canopy cover (VCC) is the vertical projection of tree crowns ignoring within-crown gaps. Angular canopy closure (ACC) is the proportion of covered sky at some angular range around the zenith, and can be measured with a field-of-view instrument, such as a camera. We compared field-measured VCC and ACC at 15 degrees and 75 degrees from the zenith to different LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) metrics, using several LiDAR data sets and comprehensive field data. The VCC was estimated to a high precision using a simple proportion of canopy points in first-return data. Confining to a maximum 15 degrees scan zenith angle, the absolute root mean squared error (RMSE) was 3.7-7.0%, with an overestimation of 3.1-4.6%. We showed that grid-based methods are capable of reducing the inherent overestimation of VCC. The low scan angles and low power settings that are typically applied in topographic LiDARs are not suitable for ACC estimation as they measure in wrong geometry and cannot easily detect small within-crown gaps. However, ACC at 0-15 degrees zenith angles could be estimated from LiDAR data with sufficient precision, using also the last returns (RMSE 8.1-113%, bias -6.1-+4.6%). The dependency of LiDAR metrics and ACC at 0-75 degrees zenith angles was nonlinear and was modeled from laser pulse proportions with nonlinear regression with a best-case standard error of 4.1%. We also estimated leaf area index from the LiDAR metrics with linear regression with a standard error of 0.38. The results show that correlations between airborne laser metrics and different canopy field characteristics are very high if the field measurements are done with equivalent accuracy.
机译:森林冠层覆盖的遥感最近已被广泛研究,但对田间验证数据的质量关注很少。生态文献有两个不同的覆盖率指标。垂直树冠覆盖(VCC)是树冠的垂直投影,忽略了树冠间的间隙。角顶篷关闭度(ACC)是围绕天顶一定角度范围内的天空覆盖比例,可以使用视场仪器(例如照相机)进行测量。我们使用几个LiDAR数据集和全面的现场数据,将与天顶成15度和75度的现场测量的VCC和ACC与不同的LiDAR(光检测和测距)指标进行了比较。使用首次回波数据中的顶篷点的简单比例,即可对VCC进行高精度估算。限于最大15度扫描天顶角,绝对均方根误差(RMSE)为3.7-7.0%,高估了3.1-4.6%。我们证明了基于网格的方法能够减少VCC固有的高估。地形LiDAR中通常使用的低扫描角度和低功率设置不适合ACC估计,因为它们以错误的几何形状进行测量并且无法轻易检测到小的冠内间隙。但是,也可以使用最近的返回值(RMSE 8.1-113%,偏差-6.1- + 4.6%)从LiDAR数据以足够的精度估算出0-15度天顶角的ACC。 LiDAR量度和ACC在0-75度天顶角之间的相关性是非线性的,并且是根据激光脉冲比例建模的,具有非线性回归,最佳情况下的标准误差为4.1%。我们还根据线性回归的LiDAR指标估算了叶面积指数,标准误为0.38。结果表明,如果以等效精度进行野外测量,则机载激光指标与不同冠层野外特性之间的相关性非常高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号