首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Validation of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a concentrations in the Southern Ocean: A revisit
【24h】

Validation of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a concentrations in the Southern Ocean: A revisit

机译:验证南大洋中SeaWiFS叶绿素a的浓度:回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Surface chlorophyll a concentrations (C-a, mg m(-3)) in the Southern Ocean estimated from SeaWiFS satellite data have been reported in the literature to be significantly lower than those measured from in situ water samples using fluorometric methods. However, we found that high-resolution (similar to 1 km(2)/pixel) daily SeaWiFS C-a (C-a(SWF)) data (SeaDAS4.8, OC4v4 algorithm) was an accurate measure of in situ C-a during January-February of 1998-2002 if concurrent in situ data measured by HPLC (C-a(HPLC)) instead of fluorometric (C-a(Fluor)) measurements were used as ground truth. Our analyses indicate that C-a(Fluor) is 2.48 +/- 2.23 (n = 647) times greater than C-a(HPLC) between 0.05 and 1.5 mg m(-3) and that the percentage overestimation of in situ C, by fluorometric measurements increases with decreasing concentrations. The ratio of C-a(SWF)/C-a(PLC) is 1.12 +/- 0.91 (n = 96), whereas the ratio of C-a(SWF)/Ca-Fluor is 0.55 +/- 0.63 (n = 307). Furthermore, there is no significant bias in C-a(SWF) (12% and -0.07 in linear and log-transformed C-a, respectively) when C-a(HPLC) is used as ground truth instead of C-a(Fluor). The high C-a(Fluor)/C-a(HPLC) ratio may be attributed to the relatively low concentrations of chlorophyll b (C-b/C-a = 0.023 +/- 0.034, n = 482) and relatively high concentrations of chlorophyll c (C-c/C-a = 0.25 +/- 0.59, n = 482) in the phytoplankton pigment composition when compared to values from other regions. Because more than 90% of the waters in the study area, as well as in the entire Southern Ocean (south of 60 degrees S), have C-a(SWF) between 0.05 and 1.5 mg m(-3), we consider that the SeaWiFS performance of C-a retrieval is satisfactory and for this C-a range there is no need to further develop a "regional" bio-optical algorithm to account for the previous SeaWiFS "underestimation". (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:据文献报道,从SeaWiFS卫星数据估计的南大洋中的表面叶绿素a浓度(C-a,mg m(-3))明显低于使用荧光法从原位水样中测得的浓度。但是,我们发现高分辨率的SeaWiFS Ca(Ca(SWF))每日数据(类似于1 km(2)/像素)(SeaDAS4.8,OC4v4算法)是在1月至2月期间原位Ca的准确测量。 1998-2002年,如果使用通过HPLC(Ca(HPLC))代替荧光法(Ca(Fluor))测量的并发原位数据作为基础事实。我们的分析表明,在0.05和1.5 mg m(-3)之间,Ca(氟)比Ca(HPLC)大2.48 +/- 2.23(n = 647)倍,并且通过荧光测量法高估了原位C的百分比浓度降低。 C-a(SWF)/ C-a(PLC)之比为1.12 +/- 0.91(n = 96),而C-a(SWF)/ Ca-Fluor之比为0.55 +/- 0.63(n = 307)。此外,当使用C-a(HPLC)代替C-a(Fluor)作为基本成分时,C-a(SWF)没有显着偏差(线性和对数转换的C-a分别为12%和-0.07)。高Ca(Fluor)/ Ca(HPLC)比可能归因于较低浓度的叶绿素b(Cb / Ca = 0.023 +/- 0.034,n = 482)和较高浓度的叶绿素c(Cc / Ca =与其他地区的值相比,浮游植物色素组合物中的0.25 +/- 0.59,n = 482)。因为研究区域以及整个南部海洋(南纬60度以南)中超过90%的水域的Ca(SWF)在0.05至1.5 mg m(-3)之间,所以我们认为SeaWiFS Ca检索的性能令人满意,对于此Ca范围,无需进一步开发“区域”生物光学算法来解决先前的SeaWiFS“低估”。 (c)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号