...
首页> 外文期刊>Liver international : >How to optimize HCV therapy in genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis
【24h】

How to optimize HCV therapy in genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis

机译:基因型1肝硬化患者如何优化HCV治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Of all hepatitis C virus patients, those with cirrhosis are most in need of treatment owing to increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) has clearly shown the benefits of successful treatment by improving fibrosis, causing the regression of cirrhosis and reducing and preventing cirrhosis-related complications. However, the sustained virological response (SVR) is lower in patients with cirrhosis. First generation protease inhibitors (boceprevir and telaprevir) in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV are a major advancement in the treatment of both na?ve and treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients. In na?ve patients, the SVR rate with the triple regimen with boceprevir increased by 14% in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared to PEG-IFN/RBV compared by 30% in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. The SVR rate of the triple regimen with telaprevir increased by 10-30% compared to PEG-IFN/RBV in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis and by nearly 30% in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. The greatest benefits seem to be found in patients with cirrhosis who have relapsed, and is limited in prior non-responder patients. Thus, the choice of triple therapy in the latter should be considered in relation to the increase in side effects. There are no data on the efficacy of the triple regimen in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Results in real-life settings show that patients with cirrhosis need to be carefully followed-up during treatment due to the increase in side effects that are greater than in clinical studies. Next generation DAAs and PEG-IFN/RBV appear to be more effective and have fewer side effects in patients with cirrhosis. Ultimately, an interferon-free regimen of DAAs combinations will probably provide a SVR in patients with cirrhosis and will probably be proposed in patients with more advanced or decompensated cirrhosis.
机译:在所有丙型肝炎病毒患者中,由于发病率和死亡率增加,肝硬化患者最需要治疗。聚乙二醇化干扰素和利巴韦林(PEG-IFN / RBV)的治疗通过改善纤维化,引起肝硬化消退并减少和预防与肝硬化相关的并发症,已清楚显示出成功治疗的益处。但是,肝硬化患者的持续病毒学应答(SVR)较低。第一代蛋白酶抑制剂(boceprevir和telaprevir)与PEG-IFN / RBV的结合在治疗初次和有经验的基因型1患者中都取得了重大进展。在初次治疗的患者中,与PEG-IFN / RBV相比,重度纤维化或肝硬化患者中三联Boceprevir方案的SVR率提高了14%,而轻度或中度纤维化患者则提高了30%。与PEG-IFN / RBV相比,在患有严重纤维化或肝硬化的患者中,使用telaprevir的三联疗法的SVR率提高了10-30%,对于轻度或中度纤维化的患者,其SVR率提高了近30%。似乎在复发的肝硬化患者中发现了最大的益处,而在先前的无反应者中效果有限。因此,应考虑到副作用的增加来选择后者中的三联疗法。没有关于失代偿性肝硬化患者三联疗法疗效的数据。现实生活中的结果表明,由于副作用的增加大于临床研究,肝硬化患者在治疗期间需要仔细随访。下一代DAA和PEG-IFN / RBV在肝硬化患者中似乎更有效且副作用更少。最终,DAA组合的无干扰素疗法可能会在肝硬化患者中提供SVR,并且可能会在晚期或代偿性肝硬化患者中提出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号