首页> 外文期刊>Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems >Six-year comparison between organic, IPM and conventional cotton production systems in the Northern San Joaquin Valley, California.
【24h】

Six-year comparison between organic, IPM and conventional cotton production systems in the Northern San Joaquin Valley, California.

机译:加利福尼亚北部圣华金河谷有机,IPM和常规棉花生产系统之间的六年比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three cotton production strategies (certified organic, conventionally grown, and reduced insecticide input/integrated pest management or IPM) were evaluated in the Northern San Joaquin Valley (NSJV), California, USA, from 1996 to 2001. Arthropod abundance, plant development, plant density, pesticide use, cost of production, lint quality, and yields were evaluated. The overall pest abundance was low, and the population of a key cotton fruit pest, Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug), did not exceed action thresholds in any treatment. Organic fields had higher densities of generalist insect predators than conventional fields during at least one seasonal interval in all but one year. While there were no significant differences in plant development, plant densities at harvest were lower in organic fields than in conventional and IPM fields. Some measures of lint quality (colour grade and bale leaf rating) were also lower in the organic treatment than in either the IPM or the conventional treatment. Synthetic insecticides, not allowed for use in organic production, were also used in significantly lower quantities in the IPM fields than in the conventional fields. Over the 6-year period of the study, IPM fields averaged 0.63 kg of active ingredient (AI) insecticide per hectare, compared to 1.02 kg AI ha-1 for conventional fields (a reduction of 38%). Costs of production per bale were on average 37% higher for organic than for conventional cotton. This cost differential was primarily due to greater hand weeding costs and significantly lower yields in organic cotton compared with either IPM or conventional cotton. The average 6-year yields were 4.4, 5.4 and 6.7 bales ha-1 for organic, IPM and conventional treatments, respectively. Low world cotton prices and the lack of premium prices for organic cotton are the primary obstacles for continued production in the NSJV. [1 bale=217.72 kg].
机译:1996年至2001年,在美国加利福尼亚州的北圣华金河谷(NSJV)评估了三种棉花生产策略(认证的有机,常规种植和减少的杀虫剂输入/病虫害综合治理或IPM)。评估密度,杀虫剂使用,生产成本,皮棉质量和产量。害虫的总体丰度很低,关键棉花果实害虫阔叶猴(西部失去光泽的植物虫)的种群在任何处理中均未超过行动阈值。在除一年以外的至少一年的季节性间隔中,有机田比普通田的昆虫捕食者密度更高。虽然植物发育没有显着差异,但有机田的收获时植物密度低于常规田和IPM田。有机处理中的某些皮棉质量指标(颜色等级和大包叶等级)也低于IPM或常规处理。与传统领域相比,IPM领域中使用的合成杀虫剂的使用量也大大减少。在为期6年的研究中,IPM田地每公顷平均种植了0.63千克活性成分(AI)杀虫剂,而常规田地的AI ha -1 为1.02千克(减少38%) 。有机棉每包的生产成本平均比传统棉高37%。该成本差异主要是由于与IPM或常规棉相比,人工棉的除草成本更高,有机棉的产量明显较低。有机,IPM和常规处理的6年平均产量分别为4.4、5.4和6.7包ha -1 。世界棉花价格低迷和有机棉溢价不足是NSJV继续生产的主要障碍。 [1包= 217.72公斤]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号