首页> 外文期刊>Research in Veterinary Science >Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods
【24h】

Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods

机译:通过三种不同的提取方法评估从犬血样品中回收的基因组DNA的质量和数量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ideal method for genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction should recover high quantities of pure, integral gDNA from the original sample source with minimal co-extraction of inhibitors of downstream processes. Canine ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) treated and clotted blood samples were extracted by three different methods (a silica column method, a phenol-chloroform method and a modified salt precipitation method). Phenol-chloroform and modified salt precipitation based extractions demonstrated similar relative recovery of gDNA with EDTA preserved blood, but were less efficient at recovering gDNA from clotted blood. Spectrophotometer measurement of phenol-chloroform based extractions tended to overestimate the quantity of gDNA recovered from extractions, and was associated with the greater co-extraction of PCR inhibitors. The silica column method recovered gDNA with equal efficiency, purity and integrity irrespective of the sample type or method of quantification.
机译:理想的基因组DNA(gDNA)提取方法应从原始样品源中回收大量纯净的完整gDNA,同时尽量减少下游过程抑制剂的共提取。用三种不同的方法(硅胶柱法,苯酚-氯仿法和改良盐沉淀法)提取犬乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理和凝结的血液样本。基于苯酚-氯仿和盐沉淀法的提取物与用EDTA保存的血液中的gDNA相对回收率相似,但是从凝结的血液中回收gDNA的效率较低。分光光度计对基于苯酚-氯仿的提取物的测定往往会高估从提取物中回收的gDNA的量,并且与PCR抑制剂的共提取量更大有关。硅胶柱法可回收的gDNA具有相同的效率,纯度和完整性,而与样品类型或定量方法无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号