首页> 外文期刊>Research in social & administrative pharmacy: RSAP >Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: The Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS)
【24h】

Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: The Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS)

机译:普通诊所的药剂师咨询:药剂师实践研究(PIPS)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are a concern in primary care settings. Pharmacists based in the community or community pharmacies are able to identify, resolve and prevent MRPs; however, the lack of a formal partnership with physicians and poor access to patients' medical records are limitations. In Australia, delivery of pharmacist services within general practice clinics is rare. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of consultations by pharmacists based within primary care medical practices. Methods: A prospective, before-after intervention study was conducted at two primary health care (general practice) clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were clinic patients who had risk-factors for MRPs (e.g. polypharmacy). Patients received a consultation with the pharmacist in a private consulting room at the clinic or in their home. The pharmacist reviewed the patient's medication regimen and adherence, with full access to their medical record, provided patient education, and produced a report for the general practitioner. The primary outcome was the number of MRPs identified by the pharmacist, and the number that remained unresolved 6 months after the pharmacist consultation. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence, health service use, and patient satisfaction. Results: Eighty-two patients were recruited and 62 (75.6%) completed the study. The median number of MRPs per patient identified by the practice pharmacist was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1, 4). Six months after review, this fell to 0 (IQR 0, 1), P<0.001. The proportion of patients who were adherent to their medications improved significantly, according to both the Morisky (44.1% versus 62.7%, P=0.023) and the Tool for Adherence Behaviour Screening (TABS) (35.6% versus 57.6%, P=0.019) scales. There was no significant effect on health service use. Patients were highly satisfied with the pharmacist consultations. Conclusions: Consultations undertaken by pharmacists located within primary health care clinics were effective in identifying and resolving MRPs. The consultations were well received by patients and were associated with improvements in medication adherence.
机译:背景:与药物有关的问题(MRP)是基层医疗机构所关心的问题。社区或社区药房的药剂师能够识别,解决和预防MRP;但是,缺乏与医生的正式合作伙伴关系以及难以获得患者病历的局限性。在澳大利亚,在全科诊所提供药剂师服务的情况很少。目的:评估在初级保健医疗实践中药剂师进行咨询的有效性。方法:在澳大利亚墨尔本的两家初级卫生保健(普通科)诊所进行了一项前瞻性干预研究。参与者是具有MRP危险因素的临床患者(例如,多药店)。患者在诊所或家中的私人咨询室接受了药剂师的咨询。药剂师可以全面访问患者的病历,审查患者的用药方案和依从性,提供患者教育,并为全科医生提供报告。主要结局是药剂师确定的MRP数量,以及在药剂师咨询后6个月仍未解决的数量。次要结果包括药物依从性,卫生服务使用和患者满意度。结果:招募了82位患者,其中62位(75.6%)完成了研究。由实践药剂师确定的每位患者的MRP中位数为2(四分位间距[IQR] 1、4)。审查六个月后,该值降至0(IQR 0,1),P <0.001。根据Morisky(分别为44.1%和62.7%,P = 0.023)和坚持行为筛查工具(TABS)(分别为35.6%和57.6%,P = 0.019),坚持用药的患者比例显着提高。秤。对卫生服务的使用没有显着影响。患者对药剂师的咨询非常满意。结论:位于初级卫生保健诊所内的药剂师进行的咨询有效地识别和解决了MRP。咨询得到了患者的好评,并与药物依从性的改善有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号