...
首页> 外文期刊>Renal failure. >Acute effects of intermittent hemodialysis and sustained low-efficiency hemodialysis (SLED) on the pulmonary function of patients under mechanical ventilation.
【24h】

Acute effects of intermittent hemodialysis and sustained low-efficiency hemodialysis (SLED) on the pulmonary function of patients under mechanical ventilation.

机译:间歇性血液透析和持续低效率血液透析(SLED)对机械通气患者肺功能的急性影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of hemodialysis (HD) on pulmonary function are still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) on the respiratory mechanics of ICU patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. We prospectively studied 31 patients. Laboratory and respiratory evaluation (static and dynamic compliance and resistance) was performed pre- and post-HD. Forty HD sessions were studied and grouped in: SLED (n = 17; Qa = 200-250 mL/min, Qd = 300 mL/min) and IHD (n = 23; Qa = 250-300 mL/min, Qd = 500 mL/min). There was no difference between the groups according to age, gender, comorbidities, APACHE II, and cause of mechanical ventilation, but pre-HD, patients in the IHD group had higher levels of plasma creatinine (5.4 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.3 mg/dL, p = 0.048) and platelets (286 +/- 186 vs. 174 +/- 95 10(3)/mm(2), p = 0.032) and lower arterial pH (7.37 +/- 0.07 vs. 7.42 +/- 0.05, p = 0.02). The efficiency of the treatment was similar (p > 0.05) with both types of HD regarding fluid removal, urea reduction rate, and decrease in plasma creatinine. Pre-HD, the ventilatory conditions of both groups were similar (p > 0.05) except for pressure support ventilation and airflow resistance. There were no changes (pre- versus post-HD p > 0.05) induced either by IHD or SLED in the ratio PaO(2)/FiO(2) or in any measured ventilatory parameter. In conclusion, neither IHD nor SLED modifies the pulmonary function of patients under mechanical ventilation.
机译:血液透析(HD)对肺功能的影响仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估间歇性血液透析(IHD)和持续低效率透析(SLED)对有创机械通气下ICU患者呼吸力学的影响。我们对31例患者进行了前瞻性研究。在高清之前和之后进行实验室和呼吸评估(静态和动态依从性和抵抗力)。研究了40个HD会话并将其分组为:SLED(n = 17; Qa = 200-250 mL / min,Qd = 300 mL / min)和IHD(n = 23; Qa = 250-300 mL / min,Qd = 500 mL / min)。根据年龄,性别,合并症,APACHE II和机械通气的原因,两组之间没有差异,但HD前,IHD组患者的血浆肌酐水平较高(5.4 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.2 + /-1.3 mg / dL,p = 0.048)和血小板(286 +/- 186 vs. 174 +/- 95 10(3)/ mm(2),p = 0.032)和较低的动脉pH(7.37 +/- 0.07)与7.42 +/- 0.05,p = 0.02)。对于两种类型的HD,在液体去除,尿素减少率和血浆肌酐减少方面,治疗效率相似(p> 0.05)。 HD之前,除压力支持通气和气流阻力外,两组的通气条件相似(p> 0.05)。由IHD或SLED引起的PaO(2)/ FiO(2)比或任何测量的通气参数均无变化(HD前与HD后p> 0.05)。总之,在机械通气下,IHD和SLED均不能改变患者的肺功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号