首页> 外文期刊>Rapid prototyping journal >Comparison of density measurement techniques for additive manufactured metallic parts
【24h】

Comparison of density measurement techniques for additive manufactured metallic parts

机译:增材制造的金属零件的密度测量技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - In the optimisation of processing parameters for additive manufactured parts using, e.g. selective laser melting (SLM) or electron beam melting, the measurement of the part densities is essential and of high interest. However, there is no common standard. Different institutes and system providers are using their own principles and guidelines. This study investigates the accuracies of the three measurement principles: Archimedes method, microscopic analysis of cross sections and X-ray scanning. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 15 test samples on five density levels (densities between 90 and 99.5 per cent) were produced using the SLM process. The samples are analysed regarding the accuracy of the measurement principles and their reproducibility taking into account influencing parameters like the buoyancy of a sample in air (Archimedes method) or different magnifications of a cross section. Findings - The Archimedes method shows a very high accuracy (±0.08 per cent for high densities) and repeatability (±<0.1 per cent) on all density levels. In contrast to the Archimedes method, taking a micrograph of a specific cross section allows to influence the resulting density and the coefficient of variation reaches values > 4 per cent. However, for low porosities, mean densities are comparable to the results of the Archimedes method even though calculated densities are typically somewhat too high. The advantage of the image guided analysis (2D and 3D) is getting more information about the distribution, size and form of pores in the part. Originality/value - The findings do not only refer to metallic parts but generally to all parts having a specific porosity. The study is a contribution to the American Society for Testing and Materials initiative F42 "Additive Manufacturing Technology" and especially to the subcommittee "test methods".
机译:目的-在优化增材制造零件的工艺参数时,使用例如选择性激光熔化(SLM)或电子束熔化,部件密度的测量是必不可少的,并且引起人们的极大兴趣。但是,没有通用的标准。不同的机构和系统提供者正在使用自己的原则和指南。本研究调查了三种测量原理的准确性:阿基米德法,横截面的显微分析和X射线扫描。设计/方法/方法-使用SLM工艺,以五个密度级别(密度在90%至99.5%之间)生产了总共15个测试样品。考虑到影响参数(例如,样品在空气中的浮力(Archimedes方法)或横截面的不同放大倍数),对样品的测量原理的准确性及其可重复性进行了分析。结果-阿基米德方法在所有密度水平下均显示出极高的准确性(高密度时为±0.08%)和可重复性(±<0.1%)。与阿基米德方法相反,对特定横截面进行显微照相可以影响所得的密度,并且变异系数达到> 4%的值。但是,对于低孔隙率,即使计算的密度通常过高,平均密度也可以与阿基米德方法的结果相媲美。图像引导分析(2D和3D)的优点是可以获得有关零件中孔的分布,大小和形式的更多信息。原创性/价值-研究结果不仅涉及金属零件,而且通常涉及具有特定孔隙率的所有零件。该研究是对美国测试和材料学会倡议F42“增材制造技术”的贡献,特别是对小组委员会“测试方法”的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号