...
首页> 外文期刊>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: RCM >Error assessment of nitrogen and oxygen isotope ratios of nitrate as determined via the bacterial denitrification method
【24h】

Error assessment of nitrogen and oxygen isotope ratios of nitrate as determined via the bacterial denitrification method

机译:通过细菌反硝化方法确定的硝酸盐氮,氧同位素比的误差评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Currently, bacterial denitrification is becoming the accepted method for δ~(15)Nand δ~(18)O-NO~-_3 determination. However, proper correction methods with international references (USGS32, USGS34 and USGS35) are needed. As a consequence, it is important to realize that the corrected isotope values are derived from a combination of several other measurements with associated uncertainties. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the propagated uncertainty on the final isotope value. This study demonstrates how to correctly estimate the uncertainty on corrected δ~(15)Nand δ~(18)O-NO_3~- values using a first-order Taylor series approximation. The bacterial denitrification method errors from 33 batches of 561 surface water samples varied from 0.2 to 2.1‰ for δ~(15)N-NO_3~- and from 0.7 to 2.3‰ for δ~(18)O-NO_3~-, which is slightly wider than the machine error, which varied from 0.2 to 0.6‰ for δ~(15)N-N_2O and from 0.4 to 1.0‰ for δ~(18)O-N_2O. The overall uncertainties, which are composed of the machine error and the method error, for the 33 batches ranged from 0.3 to 2.2‰ for δ~(15)N-NO_3~- and from 0.8 to 2.5‰ for δ~(18)O-NO_3~-. In addition, the mean corrected δ~(15)N and δ~(18)O values of 132 KNO_3-IWS (internal working standard) measurements were computed as 8.4±1.0‰ and 25.1±2.0‰, which is a slight underestimation for δ~(15)N and overestimation for δ~(18)O compared with the accepted values (δ~(15)N=9.9±0.3‰ and δ~(18)O= 24.0±0.3‰). The overall uncertainty of the bacterial denitrification method allows the use of this method for source identification of NO_3~-.
机译:目前,细菌反硝化正成为δ〜(15)N和δ〜(18)O-NO〜-_3测定的公认方法。但是,需要使用具有国际参考标准的正确校正方法(USGS32,USGS34和USGS35)。因此,重要的是要认识到校正后的同位素值是从几种其他测量结果与相关不确定性的组合中得出的。因此,有必要考虑最终同位素值的传播不确定性。这项研究证明了如何使用一阶泰勒级数逼近来正确估计校正后的δ〜(15)N和δ〜(18)O-NO_3〜-值的不确定性。 δ〜(15)N-NO_3〜-的33批次地表水样品的细菌反硝化方法误差从0.2到2.1‰,δ〜(18)O-NO_3〜-的从0.7到2.3‰。稍大于机器误差,对于δ〜(15)N-N_2O,其误差在0.2至0.6‰之间;对于δ〜(18)O-N_2O,其误差在0.4至1.0‰之间。 33批样品的总体不确定度由机器误差和方法误差组成,δ〜(15)N-NO_3〜-的范围为0.3至2.2‰,δ〜(18)O的范围为0.8至2.5‰。 -NO_3〜-另外,计算得出的132个KNO_3-IWS(内部工作标准)测量值的平均校正后的δ〜(15)N和δ〜(18)O值分别为8.4±1.0‰和25.1±2.0‰,对于δ〜(15)N和δ〜(18)O与接受值的高估(δ〜(15)N = 9.9±0.3‰和δ〜(18)O = 24.0±0.3‰)。细菌反硝化方法的总体不确定性允许将该方法用于NO_3〜-的来源识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号