首页> 外文期刊>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: RCM >Systematic comparison of delta S-34 measurements by multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and evaluation of full uncertainty budget using two different metrological approaches
【24h】

Systematic comparison of delta S-34 measurements by multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and evaluation of full uncertainty budget using two different metrological approaches

机译:多收集器电感耦合等离子体质谱法对δS-34测量值的系统比较,并使用两种不同的计量方法对完全不确定性预算进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A systematic comparison of delta S-34 measurements by multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MCICPMS) using two different standardisation approaches and two different reference materials as working standards is reported for the first time. Full uncertainty budgets have been calculated using the Kragten approach. Internal standardisation by measuring Si ratios and external standardisation by bracketing samples with either NIST RM8553 or NIST RM8554 have been compared to correct for the effects of mass bias. The delta S-34 value and the associated uncertainty No) were found to be slightly different when using different approaches. Corrected S-34:S-32 ratios for NIST RM8553 and NIST RM8554 differed from those previously reported by 0.1 to 0.5% when using external standardisation. S-34:S-32 ratios for NIST RM8553 and NIST RM8554 differed from those previously reported by 0.06 to 0.15% when using Si internal standardisation. This indicated that in order to minimise deviation from true ratio values, Si internal standardisation would be a more appropriate option when using a Neptune MCICPMS instrument. delta S-34 values were obtained for four different methionine samples and expanded uncertainties (k = 2) expressed in delta S-34 No) ranged from 0.7 parts per thousand to 1.6 parts per thousand. Regardless of the approach used for the mass bias correction, three parameters provided the major contributions to the standard uncertainty of the delta(SV)-S-34-CDT value. These were the measured S-34:S-32 in the sample, the measured S-34:S-32 for the working standard and the known delta(SV)-S-34-CDT value of the working standard. Results using both approaches are compared and the Si internal standardisation approach is used to provide results for an inter-laboratory comparison. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:首次报道了使用两种不同的标准化方法和两种不同的参考材料作为工作标准的多收集器电感耦合等离子体质谱法(MCICPMS)对δS-34测量值的系统比较。已使用Kragten方法计算了全部不确定性预算。比较了通过测量Si比进行的内部标准化和通过将样品与NIST RM8553或NIST RM8554放在括号中进行的外部标准化,以校正质量偏差的影响。当使用不同的方法时,发现δS-34值和相关的不确定性No)略有不同。使用外部标准化时,已校正的NIST RM8553和NIST RM8554的S-34:S-32比率与先前报告的比率相差0.1%至0.5%。使用Si内标法时,NIST RM8553和NIST RM8554的S-34:S-32比值与以前报道的值相比,相差0.06%至0.15%。这表明,为了最小化与真实比率值的偏差,在使用Neptune MCICPMS仪器时,Si内标化将是更合适的选择。获得了四个不同蛋氨酸样品的δS-34值,以δS-34 No表示的扩展不确定性(k = 2)在千分之0.7至千分之1.6之间。无论采用何种方法校正质量偏差,三个参数都对δ(SV)-S-34-CDT值的标准不确定度做出了主要贡献。这些是样品中测得的S-34:S-32,工作标准品的测量S-34:S-32和工作标准品的已知delta(SV)-S-34-CDT值。比较使用两种方法的结果,并使用Si内部标准化方法为实验室间的比较提供结果。版权所有(c)2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号