首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: Comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images
【24h】

Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: Comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images

机译:使用合成重建的投影图像进行双视图数字化乳房断层合成筛查:与使用全视野数字化乳房X线照片进行数字化乳房断层合成的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the performance of two versions of reconstructed two-dimensional (2D) images in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus the performance of standard full-field digital mammography (FFDM) plus DBT. Materials and Methods: This trial had ethical committee approval, and all participants gave written informed consent. Examinations (n = 24 901) in women between the ages of 50 and 69 years (mean age, 59.2 years) were interpreted prospectively as part of a screening trial that included independent interpretations of FFDM plus DBT and reconstructed 2D images plus DBT. Reconstructed 2D images do not require radiation exposure. Using analyses for binary data that accounted for correlated interpretations and were adjusted for reader-specific volume, two versions (initial and current) of reconstructed 2D images used during trial periods 1 (from November 22, 2010, to December 21, 2011; 12 631 women) and 2 (from January 20, 2012, to December 19, 2012; 12 270 women) were compared in terms of cancer detection and false-positive rates with the corresponding FFDM plus DBT interpretations. Results: Cancer detection rates were 8.0, 7.4, 7.8, and 7.7 per 1000 screening examinations for FFDM plus DBT in period 1, initial reconstructed 2D images plus DBT in period 1, FFDM plus DBT in period 2, and current reconstructed 2D images plus DBT in period 2, respectively. False-positive scores were 5.3%, 4.6%, 4.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. Corresponding reader-adjusted paired comparisons of false-positive scores revealed significant differences for period 1 (P =.012) but not for period 2 (ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.11; P =.85). Conclusion: The combination of current reconstructed 2D images and DBT performed comparably to FFDM plus DBT and is adequate for routine clinical use when interpreting screening mammograms.
机译:目的:比较两种版本的重建二维(2D)图像与数字乳房断层合成(DBT)的性能与标准全视野数字乳房X线摄影(FFDM)和DBT的性能。材料和方法:该试验已获得伦理委员会的批准,所有参与者均签署了知情同意书。作为筛查试验的一部分,对50岁至69岁(平均年龄59.2岁)妇女的检查(n = 24 901)进行了前瞻性解释,其中包括对FFDM和DBT的独立解释以及重建的2D图像和DBT。重建的2D图像不需要辐射。使用解释了相关解释并针对读者特定量进行调整的二进制数据分析,在试用期1(从2010年11月22日至2011年12月21日)中使用了两个版本的重建2D图像(初始和当前);妇女)和2名(从2012年1月20日至2012年12月19日; 12 270名妇女)的癌症检测率和假阳性率与相应的FFDM和DBT解释进行了比较。结果:第1阶段FFDM和DBT的癌症检出率为每1000次筛查检查分别为8.0、7.4、7.8和7.7,第1阶段的初始重建2D图像加上DBT以及第2阶段的FFDM + DBT和当前的2D图像加上DBT在第2期。假阳性分数分别为5.3%,4.6%,4.6%和4.5%。相应的读者调整后的假阳性分数配对比较显示,第一期的差异显着(P = .012),第二期的差异不明显(比率= 0.99; 95%置信区间:0.88,1.11; P = .85)。结论:目前重建的2D图像和DBT的组合可与FFDM和DBT媲美,并且在解释乳腺X线照片时足以用于常规临床。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号