首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results.
【24h】

Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results.

机译:在胰腺实质期检测胰腺肿瘤,图像质量和放射剂量:低管电压,高管电流CT技术的效果-初步结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare a low-tube-voltage (80 kVp), high-tube-current (675 mA) computed tomographic (CT) technique with a high-tube-voltage (140 kVp) CT protocol for the detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-center, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-seven patients (nine men, 18 women; mean age, 64 years) with 23 solitary pancreatic tumors underwent dual-energy CT. Two imaging protocols were used: 140 kVp and 385 mA (protocol A) and 80 kVp and 675 mA (protocol B). For both protocols, the following variables were compared during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: contrast enhancement for the aorta, the pancreas, and the portal vein; pancreas-to-tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); noise; and effective dose. Two blinded, independent readers qualitatively scored the two data sets for tumor detection and image quality. Random-effect analysis of variance tests were used to compare differences between the two protocols. RESULTS: Compared with protocol A, protocol B yielded significantly higher contrast enhancement for the aorta (508.6 HU vs 221.5 HU, respectively), pancreas (151.2 HU vs 67.0 HU), and portal vein (189.7 HU vs 87.3 HU), along with a greater pancreas-to-tumor CNR (8.1 vs 5.9) (P < .001 for all comparisons). No statistically significant difference in tumor detection was observed between the two protocols. Although standard deviation of image noise increased with protocol B (11.5 HU vs 18.6 HU), this protocol significantly reduced the effective dose (from 18.5 to 5.1 mSv; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique has the potential to improve the enhancement of the pancreas and peripancreatic vasculature, improve tumor conspicuity, and reduce patient radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase.
机译:目的:分别比较低管电压(80 kVp),高管电流(675 mA)计算机断层扫描(CT)技术与高管电压(140 kVp)CT方案,以检测胰腺肿瘤,胰腺实质期的图像质量和辐射剂量。材料与方法:该前瞻性,单中心,符合HIPAA的研究已获得机构审查委员会的批准,并获得了知情同意书。 27例孤立性胰腺肿瘤的27例患者(男9例,女18例;平均年龄64岁)接受了双能CT检查。使用了两种成像协议:140 kVp和385 mA(协议A)和80 kVp和675 mA(协议B)。对于这两种方案,在胰腺实质期比较了以下变量:主动脉,胰腺和门静脉的对比增强;胰腺与肿瘤对比噪声比(CNR);噪声;和有效剂量。两个盲人的独立读者定性地对两个数据集进行了评分,以检测肿瘤和图像质量。方差检验的随机效应分析用于比较两种方案之间的差异。结果:与协议A相比,协议B对主动脉(分别为508.6 HU vs 221.5 HU),胰腺(151.2 HU vs 67.0 HU)和门静脉(189.7 HU vs 87.3 HU)产生显着更高的对比度增强。胰腺到肿瘤的CNR更高(8.1与5.9)(所有比较的P <0.001)。两种方案之间未观察到肿瘤检测的统计学显着差异。尽管随着协议B图像噪声的标准偏差增加(11.5 HU对18.6 HU),但该协议显着降低了有效剂量(从18.5降至5.1 mSv; P <.001)。结论:低管电压,高管电流CT技术具有改善胰腺和胰腺周围脉管系统,增强肿瘤显着性并减少胰腺实质期患者放射剂量的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号