...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.
【24h】

Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

机译:社区实践中的乳房X射线照片解释量和诊断性X射线照片解释性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between radiologist interpretive volume and diagnostic mammography performance in community-based settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study received institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. A total of 117,136 diagnostic mammograms that were interpreted by 107 radiologists between 2002 and 2006 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted effect on sensitivity and the rates of false-positive findings and cancer detection of four volume measures: annual diagnostic volume, screening volume, total volume, and diagnostic focus (percentage of total volume that is diagnostic). Analyses were stratified by the indication for imaging: additional imaging after screening mammography or evaluation of a breast concern or problem. RESULTS: Diagnostic volume was associated with sensitivity; the odds of a true-positive finding rose until a diagnostic volume of 1000 mammograms was reached; thereafter, they either leveled off (P < .001 for additional imaging) or decreased (P = .049 for breast concerns or problems) with further volume increases. Diagnostic focus was associated with false-positive rate; the odds of a false-positive finding increased until a diagnostic focus of 20% was reached and decreased thereafter (P < .024 for additional imaging and P < .001 for breast concerns or problems with no self-reported lump). Neither total volume nor screening volume was consistently associated with diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION: Interpretive volume and diagnostic performance have complex multifaceted relationships. Our results suggest that diagnostic interpretive volume is a key determinant in the development of thresholds for considering a diagnostic mammogram to be abnormal. Current volume regulations do not distinguish between screening and diagnostic mammography, and doing so would likely be challenging.
机译:目的:研究在社区环境下放射线医师的解释量与乳腺X线摄影表现之间的关系。材料与方法:该研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并且符合HIPAA。总共包括117136例诊断性X线照片,由2002年至2006年间在乳腺癌监测联合会中由107位放射科医生解释。使用Logistic回归分析来评估对以下四个量度指标的敏感性,假阳性结果和癌症检测率的调整效果:年度诊断量,筛查量,总体积和诊断重点(占诊断总量的百分比) 。根据影像学指征对分析进行分层:筛查乳腺X线摄影或评估乳房问题或问题后进行其他影像学检查。结果:诊断量与敏感性相关。直到诊断出的1000幅乳腺X线照片的真实阳性结果的可能性增加。此后,随着体积的进​​一步增大,它们趋于平稳(对于其他影像学来说,P <.001)或下降(对于乳房问题或问题,P = .049)。诊断重点与假阳性率有关。假阳性结果的可能性增加,直到达到20%的诊断焦点为止,此后降低(对于额外的成像,P <.024,对于乳房问题或无自我报告的问题,P <.001)。总体积和筛查体积均未与诊断性能始终相关。结论:解释量和诊断性能具有复杂的多方面关系。我们的结果表明,诊断解释量是确定诊断乳房X线照片异常的阈值的关键决定因素。当前的体积规则并未区分乳腺X线筛查和诊断,因此这样做可能具有挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号