首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Usual interstitial pneumonia and chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: analysis of CT appearance in 92 patients.
【24h】

Usual interstitial pneumonia and chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: analysis of CT appearance in 92 patients.

机译:普通间质性肺炎和慢性特发性间质性肺炎:92例患者的CT表现分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze computed tomographic (CT) findings of chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and to determine which findings are most helpful for distinguishing IIP from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) with univariate and multivariate analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required for this retrospective review of patient records and images. Two observers working independently and without knowledge of the diagnosis evaluated the extent and distribution of various thin-section CT findings (ground-glass opacity, consolidation, reticulation, and honeycombing) in 92 patients (51 men, 41 women; mean age, 56 years; age range, 29-81 years) with a histologic diagnosis of UIP (n = 20), cellular nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (n = 16), fibrotic NSIP (n = 16), respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD) (n 11), desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) (n interstitial pneumonia (LIP) (n = 14). Observers used univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to compare their findings with the extent and distribution of UIP. RESULTS: Observers made the correct diagnosis in 145 (79%) of 184 readings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent findings that distinguished UIP from cellular NSIP were the extent of honeycombing and the most proximal bronchus with traction bronchiectasis (odds ratio, 5.16 and 0.37, respectively); the finding that distinguished UIP from fibrotic NSIP was the extent of honeycombing (odds ratio, 2.10). CT features that distinguished UIP from RB-ILD and DIP included extent of ground-glass opacity (odds ratio, 0.76), thickening of bronchovascular bundles (odds ratio, 1.58), the most proximal bronchus with traction bronchiectasis (odds ratio, 0.22), and the number of segments with traction bronchiectasis (odds ratio, 3.64). CONCLUSION: UIP has a characteristic appearance that usually facilitates distinction from other types of chronic IIPs at thin-section CT. The most useful finding when differentiating UIP from NSIP was the extent of honeycombing.
机译:目的:回顾性分析慢性特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)的计算机体层摄影(CT)结果,并通过单因素和多因素分析,确定哪些发现最有助于将IIP与常规间质性肺炎(UIP)相区别。材料与方法:对患者记录和图像进行回顾性审查不需要机构审查委员会的批准和知情同意。两名独立工作且不了解诊断的观察员评估了92例患者(51例男性,41例女性;平均年龄56岁)的各种薄层CT检查结果(磨玻璃片混浊,固结,网状和蜂窝状)的程度和分布。 ;年龄范围为29-81岁,组织学诊断为UIP(n = 20),细胞性非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)(n = 16),纤维化NSIP(n = 16),呼吸性毛细支气管炎相关性间质性肺病( RB-ILD)(11例),脱屑性间质性肺炎(DIP)(n间质性肺炎(LIP)(n = 14)。观察者使用单因素和多因素统计分析将他们的发现与UIP的范围和分布进行比较。在184个读数中的145个(79%)中做出了正确的诊断,多因素Logistic回归分析表明,将UIP与细胞性NSIP区别开的独立发现是蜂窝状程度和牵拉性支气管最接近的支气管扩张性(奇数比分别为5.16和0.37);将UIP与纤维化NSIP区别开来的发现是蜂窝状程度(比值比为2.10)。将UIP与RB-ILD和DIP区别开来的CT特征包括:毛玻璃样不透明程度(奇数比,0.76),支气管血管束增厚(奇数比,1.58),最近端支气管伴牵引性支气管扩张(奇数比,0.22),以及支气管扩张的段数(优势比为3.64)。结论:UIP具有特征性外观,通常有助于薄层CT与其他类型的慢性IIP区分。将UIP与NSIP区别开来时,最有用的发现是蜂窝的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号