...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Effects of feeding method and physical form of starter on feed intake and performance of dairy replacement calves
【24h】

Effects of feeding method and physical form of starter on feed intake and performance of dairy replacement calves

机译:饲喂方法和发酵剂的物理形态对奶牛犊牛采食量和性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Eighty female Holstein calves (8.4pl0.35d and 41.9pl0.66kg) were individually housed until the age of 56d with the objective of assessing the effects physical form of the starter and feeding method on intake and performance. Calves were randomly allocated in sets of 20 to either a multiparticle starter offered in a bucket (MBT) or in a feed bin (MFB), or the same starter but pelleted offered in a bucket (PBT) or in a feed bin (PFB). The bucket had an upper diameter of 25cm and a bottom diameter of 16cm, with a total height of 23cm. The feeding bin was 78.5c30c30cm and had an opening for the animal access that was 28cm wide, 22cm deep, and 44.5cm high. Both starters had exactly the same ingredient and nutrient composition. Calves had ad libitum access to water and starter and received 4l/d of the same milk replacer at a 150g/kg dilution rate in two offers of 2L throughout the duration of the study. Milk replacer consumption was similar among the four treatments. However, starter consumption was affected by feeding method and by an interaction between feeding method and physical form. When starters were offered in feed bins, total DMI (24.9kg) was lower (P <0.01) than when offered in buckets (33.9kg). The decrease in DMI observed with feed bins was more evident (P <0.01) with the multiparticle than with the pelleted starter. Consequently, when the multiparticle starter was offered in feed bins, ADG was lowest (364g/d), whereas ADG from calves consuming the pelleted starter in feed bins was similar to that observed with either multiparticle or pelleted starters offered in buckets. Feed conversion efficiency (ADG/DMI) was not affected by the physical form of starter, but was affected by the feeding method, with calves receiving the starter from a feed bin having a lower (P <0.05) feed efficiency (38.1%) than those fed from a bucket (42.9%). Feeding multiparticle or texturized starters to calves using feed bins may result in decreased intake and animal performance. Furthermore, independently of the physical form of the starter, solid feed consumption and performance is greater when calves are fed from a bucket than from a feed bin.
机译:单独饲养八十只雌性荷斯坦犊牛(8.4pl0.35d和41.9pl0.66kg),直到56d年龄,目的是评估发酵剂的物理形式和饲喂方法对摄入量和生产性能的影响。将小牛以20组为一组随机分配到桶(MBT)或进料仓(MFB)中提供的多颗粒起子,或桶(PBT)或进料仓(PFB)中提供的但成粒的相同起子。 。桶的上部直径为25cm,底部直径为16cm,总高度为23cm。喂食箱为78.5c30c30cm,并具有28cm宽,22cm深和44.5cm高的供动物进入的开口。两种发酵剂的成分和营养成分完全相同。在整个研究过程中,小牛可以随意取水和发酵剂,并以150g / kg的稀释率接受4l / d的相同代乳品,稀释量为2L。四种处理之间的代乳品消耗量相似。然而,起动机的消耗受进食方法以及进食方法和物理形式之间相互作用的影响。当在饲料箱中提供发酵剂时,总DMI(24.9kg)低于在桶中提供的(33.9kg)(P <0.01)。饲料仓中观察到的DMI降低比起粒剂更明显(P <0.01)。因此,当在饲料仓中提供多颗粒发酵剂时,ADG最低(364g / d),而在饲料仓中消耗粒状发酵剂的小牛的ADG类似于在桶中提供的粒状发酵剂或颗粒发酵剂。饲料转化效率(ADG / DMI)不受发酵剂物理形式的影响,但受饲喂方法的影响,犊牛从饲料仓接收发酵剂的饲料效率低于(P <0.05)饲料效率(38.1%)那些用桶喂的(42.9%)。使用饲喂箱向小牛饲喂多颗粒或膨化发酵剂可能会导致采食量和动物性能下降。此外,独立于发酵剂的物理形式,当从桶中喂牛犊时,固体饲料的消耗和性能要比从进料仓中得到的更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号