首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Comparison of energy expenditure, eating pattern and physical activity of grazing and zero-grazing dairy cows at different time points during lactation.
【24h】

Comparison of energy expenditure, eating pattern and physical activity of grazing and zero-grazing dairy cows at different time points during lactation.

机译:泌乳期间不同时间点放牧和零放牧奶牛的能量消耗,进食方式和身体活动的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of grazing versus zero-grazing on energy expenditure (EE), feeding behaviour and physical activity in dairy cows at different stages of lactation. Fourteen Holstein cows were subjected to two treatments in a repeated crossover design with three experimental series (S1, S2, and S3) reflecting increased days in milk (DIM). At the beginning of each series, cows were on average at 38, 94 and 171 (standard deviation (SD) 10.8) DIM, respectively. Each series consisted of two periods containing a 7-d adaptation and a 7-d collection period each. Cows either grazed on pasture for 16-18.5 h per day or were kept in a freestall barn and had ad libitum access to herbage harvested from the same paddock. Herbage intake was estimated using the double alkane technique. On each day of the collection period, EE of one cow in the barn and of one cow on pasture was determined for 6 h by using the 13C bicarbonate dilution technique, with blood sample collection done either manually in the barn or using an automatic sampling system on pasture. Furthermore, during each collection period physical activity and feeding behaviour of cows were recorded over 3 d using pedometers and behaviour recorders. Milk yield decreased with increasing DIM (P<0.001) but was similar with both treatments. Herbage intake was lower (P<0.01) for grazing cows (16.8 kg dry matter (DM)/d) compared to zero-grazing cows (18.9 kg DM/d). The lowest (P<0.001) intake was observed in S1 and similar intakes were observed in S2 and S3. Within the 6-h measurement period, grazing cows expended 19% more (P<0.001) energy (319 versus 269 kJ/kg metabolic body size (BW0.75)) than zero-grazing cows and differences in EE did not change with increasing DIM. Grazing cows spent proportionally more (P<0.001) time walking and less time standing (P<0.001) and lying (P<0.05) than zero-grazing cows. The proportion of time spent eating was greater (P<0.001) and that of time spent ruminating was lower (P<0.05) for grazing cows compared to zero-grazing cows. In conclusion, lower feed intake along with the unchanged milk production indicates that grazing cows mobilized body reserves to cover additional energy requirements which were at least partly caused by more physical activity. However, changes in cows' behaviour between the considered time points during lactation were too small so that differences in EE remained similar between treatments with increasing DIM.
机译:进行了一项实验以确定放牧与零放牧对泌乳不同阶段奶牛的能量消耗(EE),喂养行为和身体活动的影响。对14头荷斯坦奶牛进行了重复交叉设计的两种处理,其中包括三个实验系列(S1,S2和S3),这反映了牛奶天数增加(DIM)。在每个系列开始时,母牛的平均DIM分别为38、94和171(标准差(SD)10.8)。每个系列由两个周期组成,每个周期分别包含一个7天的适应期和一个7天的收集期。母牛每天在牧场上放牧16-18.5小时,或被关在一个不停歇的畜舍中,可以随意取用从同一牧场收集的牧草。使用双烷烃技术估算牧草的摄入量。在采集期间的每一天,使用 13 C碳酸氢盐稀释技术,测定谷仓中一头母牛和牧场上一头母牛的EE 6小时,并在谷仓或在牧场上使用自动采样系统。此外,在每个收集期间,使用计步器和行为记录仪记录3 d内母牛的身体活动和喂养行为。牛奶产量随DIM的增加而降低(P <0.001),但与两种处理方式相似。与零放牧牛(18.9 kg DM / d)相比,放牧牛(16.8 kg干物质(dm / d))的牧草摄入量较低(P <0.01)。在S1中观察到最低的摄入量(P <0.001),在S2和S3中观察到相似的摄入量。在6小时的测量期内,放牧的牛比零放牧的牛多消耗19%(P <0.001)的能量(319比269 kJ / kg代谢体重(BW 0.75 )),差异为零。 EE不会随着DIM的增加而改变。放牧的母牛比零放牧的母牛成比例地花费更多的时间(P <0.001)步行时间和更少的站立时间(P <0.001)和躺卧时间(P <0.05)。与零吃草的母牛相比,放牧的母牛的进食时间所占比例更大(P <0.001),反刍时间所占的时间比例较低(P <0.05)。总之,较低的采食量和不变的牛奶产量表明,放牧的奶牛动员了身体储备来满足额外的能量需求,这至少部分是由更多的体育活动引起的。但是,在泌乳期间考虑的时间点之间,奶牛的行为变化太小,以至于随着DIM的增加,不同处理之间的EE差异仍然相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号