...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung cancer: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Pleural effusion hyaluronic acid as a prognostic marker in pleural malignant mesothelioma
【24h】

Pleural effusion hyaluronic acid as a prognostic marker in pleural malignant mesothelioma

机译:胸腔积液透明质酸作为胸膜恶性间皮瘤的预后指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM), a primarily asbestos-induced tumour, has a poor prognosis, with over-all 5-year survival less than 5%. Tumour biomarkers are being intensely investigated in MM as aids to diagnosis and prognosis. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is produced in MM but its role in prognostication remains uncertain. Materials and methods: HA concentrations were determined in matching serum and pleural effusion of 96 MM patients, 26 lung cancer patients and 42 patients with benign effusions resulting from infectious, cardiac, renal, liver and rheumatoid diseases and compared to the current 'best practice' biomarker, mesothelin. Liver and kidney function were determined for each patient. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) analysis following logistic regression modelling. Difference in survival between groups was determined by both log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression modelling. Results: For effusion HA, the AUC (IQ range) was 0.89 (0.82-0.94) and for effusion mesothelin, it was 0.85 (0.78-0.90). Serum HA was not diagnostically useful. A combined measure of effusion HA, and serum and effusion mesothelin had an AUC of 0.92 (0.86-0.96), which was significantly higher than effusion mesothelin alone. Effusion HA had a biphasic distribution in MM patients, dichotomised at a concentration of 75. mg/L. The median survival of MM patients with high effusion HA was 18.0 (13.7-22.4) months, significantly longer than those with low HA effusion levels (12.6 months (8.4-16.8), p= 0.004). Serum HA, and effusion and serum mesothelin were not significant prognostic indicators. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a combined biomarker panel has greater diagnostic accuracy than effusion mesothelin alone, and that significant prognostic information is provided by effusion HA.
机译:背景:恶性间皮瘤(MM)是一种主要由石棉引起的肿瘤,预后较差,总体5年生存率不到5%。 MM中正在对肿瘤生物标志物进行深入研究,以帮助诊断和预后。透明质酸(HA)在MM中产生,但其在预后中的作用仍不确定。材料和方法:测定96 MM患者,26例肺癌患者和42例因传染性,心脏病,肾脏,肾脏,肝脏和类风湿性疾病而导致的良性积液的血清和胸腔积液中的HA浓度,并与当前的“最佳做法”进行比较生物标志物,间皮素。确定每位患者的肝肾功能。诊断准确度是根据逻辑回归建模后的接收器操作员特征曲线(AUC)分析下的面积确定的。组之间的生存差异通过对数秩检验和Cox比例风险回归模型确定。结果:对于高渗HA,AUC(IQ范围)为0.89(0.82-0.94),对于间皮素,其为0.85(0.78-0.90)。血清HA对诊断没有帮助。混合测量渗出液HA,血清和渗出间皮素的AUC为0.92(0.86-0.96),明显高于单独的渗出间皮素。 MM患者中的散发性HA具有两相分布,二分浓度为75. mg / L。高积液性HA的MM患者的中位生存期为18.0(13.7-22.4)个月,明显长于低积液性HA的MM患者(12.6个月(8.4-16.8),p = 0.004)。血清HA,积液和血清间皮素不是重要的预后指标。结论:这项研究表明,与单独的渗出间皮素相比,联合使用的生物标志物检测方法具有更高的诊断准确性,并且渗出液HA可提供重要的预后信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号