首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >The Emergency Department Action in Smoking Cessation (EDASC) Trial: Impact on Cessation Outcomes
【24h】

The Emergency Department Action in Smoking Cessation (EDASC) Trial: Impact on Cessation Outcomes

机译:急诊部门戒烟行动(EDASC):对戒烟结果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The focus on acute care, time pressure, and lack of resources hamper the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to determine whether an emergency nurse- initiated intervention based on the 5As (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange) framework improves quit rates. We conducted a prepost implementation trial in 789 adult smokers who presented to two EDs in Iowa between August 13, 2008 and August 4, 2010. The intervention focused on improving delivery of the 5As by ED nurses and physicians using academic detailing, charting/reminder tools, and group feedback. Performance of ED cessation counseling was measured using a 5As composite score (ranging from 0 to 5). Smoking status was assessed by telephone interview at 3- and 6-month follow-up (with biochemical confirmation in those participants who reported abstinence at 6-month follow-up). Based on data from 650 smokers who completed the post-ED interview, there was a significant improvement in the mean 5As composite score for emergency nurses during the intervention period at both hospitals combined (1.51 vs. 0.88, difference 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.41, 0.85]). At 6-month follow-up, 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) was 6.8 and 5.1% in intervention and preintervention periods, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% CI [0.99, 2.9]). It is feasible to improve the delivery of brief smoking cessation counseling by ED staff. The observed improvements in performance of cessation counseling, however, did not translate into statistically significant improvements in cessation rates. Further improvements in the effectiveness of ED cessation interventions are needed.
机译:对急救,时间压力和资源短缺的关注阻碍了急诊室(ED)实施戒烟指南。这项研究的目的是确定基于5A(咨询,评估,评估,协助,安排)框架的护士紧急干预措施是否可以提高戒烟率。我们对789名成年吸烟者进行了事前实施试验,他们于2008年8月13日至2010年8月4日在爱荷华州向两名急诊科医师就诊。该干预措施的重点是通过急诊科护士和医生使用学术细部图,图表/提醒工具改善5A的提供,以及小组反馈。使用5As综合评分(从0到5)测量ED停止咨询的表现。在3个月和6个月的随访中(通过电话采访)对吸烟状况进行了评估(对那些在6个月的随访中报告戒酒的参与者进行了生化确认)。根据650名完成ED访谈后吸烟者的数据,在两家医院的干预期间,急诊护士的5As平均综合得分显着提高(1.51 vs. 0.88,差异0.63,95%置信区间[ CI] [0.41,0.85]。在6个月的随访中,干预和干预前7天的患病率节制(PPA)分别为6.8和5.1%(调整后的优势比[OR] 1.7、95%CI [0.99、2.9])。由教育署人员改善短暂戒烟辅导的提供是可行的。但是,观察到的戒烟咨询工作的改善并没有转化为统计上戒烟率的显着改善。急诊部戒烟干预措施的有效性需要进一步提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号