...
首页> 外文期刊>Life sciences >NITRIC OXIDE PRODUCTION BY ENDOTHELIAL CELLS - COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF QUANTIFICATION
【24h】

NITRIC OXIDE PRODUCTION BY ENDOTHELIAL CELLS - COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF QUANTIFICATION

机译:内皮细胞生产一氧化氮-三种定量方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Vascular endothelial cells have been found to produce a relaxant mediator, identified as nitric oxide (NO) and implicated in numerous physiological functions. Subsequently, there has been an intensive search for accurate and specific detection methods to measure biological NO production. In the present study, we compared three approaches to evaluate NO production, based respectively on the Griess reaction (that quantifies nitrites and nitrates after their reduction), on the hemoglobin reaction (that quantifies oxyhemoglobin to methemoglobin transformation by NO), and on the electrochemical NO detection with a porphyrinic micro-probe. Comparison was made both under standard conditions and biological conditions, through calibration curves and measurements of histamine-induced NO production by cultured human endothelial cells and its modulation by L-arginine and NO-monomethyl-1-arginine. We demonstrated that these three methods differ in terms of sensitivity and selectivity. The hemoglobin reaction and nitrate measurements suffer from a lack of specificity. Nitrite determination by the Griess reaction was hardly suitable for kinetic studies but it remains useful for the evaluation of basal NO production. The electrochemical technique, although it does not allow measurement of basal NO production, is the only one to exhibit great sensitivity and specificity and to allow instantaneous and non destructive measurements. This study brings up the potential hazards and pitfalls that may be associated with the various methods. [References: 34]
机译:已经发现血管内皮细胞产生松弛介质,被鉴定为一氧化氮(NO),并且涉及许多生理功能。随后,人们对寻找精确和特定的检测方法进行了深入研究,以测量生物NO的产生。在本研究中,我们比较了三种评估NO生成的方法,分别基于Griess反应(量化还原后的亚硝酸盐和硝酸盐),血红蛋白反应(量化NO引起的氧合血红蛋白向高铁血红蛋白转化)和电化学用卟啉微探针检测不到NO。在标准条件和生物学条件下,通过校准曲线和测量组胺诱导的培养的人内皮细胞产生的NO以及L-精氨酸和NO-单甲基-1-精氨酸的调节,进行了比较。我们证明了这三种方法在灵敏度和选择性方面有所不同。血红蛋白反应和硝酸盐测量缺乏特异性。用格里斯反应测定亚硝酸盐很难用于动力学研究,但仍可用于评估基础NO的产生。电化学技术虽然不能测量基础NO的产生,但它是唯一一种显示出高灵敏度和特异性并允许瞬时和非破坏性测量的技术。这项研究提出了可能与各种方法相关的潜在危害和陷阱。 [参考:34]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号