...
首页> 外文期刊>Life sciences >Comparative effects of the anti-platelet drugs, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and damage in rats
【24h】

Comparative effects of the anti-platelet drugs, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and damage in rats

机译:抗血小板药物氯吡格雷,噻氯匹定和西洛他唑对阿司匹林引起的大鼠胃出血和损伤的比较作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: The present study compared the effects of frequently used anti-platelet drugs, such as clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol, on the gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses induced by intraluminal perfusion with 25 mM aspirin acidified with 25 mM HC1 (acidified ASA) in rats.Main methods: The stomach was perfused with acidified ASA at a rate of 0.4 ml/min for 60 min under urethane anesthesia, and gastric bleeding was measured as the concentration of hemoglobin in the luminal perfusate, which was collected every 15 min. Clopidogrel (10-100 mg/kg), ticlopidine (10-300 mg/kg), or cilostazol (3-30 mg/kg) was given p.o. 24 h or 90 min before the perfusion of acidified ASA, respectively. Key findings: Perfusion of the stomach with acidified ASA alone led to slight bleeding and lesions in the stomach. The pretreatment with clopidogrel, even though it did not cause bleeding or damage by itself, dose-dependently increased the gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses induced by acidified ASA. Ticlopidine also aggravated the severity of damage by increasing gastric bleeding, and the effects of ticlopidine at 300 mg/kg were equivalent to those of clopidogrel at 100 mg/kg. In contrast, cilostazol dose-dependently decreased gastric bleeding and damage in response to acidified ASA.Significance: These results demonstrated that clopidogrel and ticlopidine, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, increased gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses to acidified ASA, to the same extent, while cilostazol, a phosphodies-terase III inhibitor, suppressed these responses. Therefore, cilostazol may be safely used in dual anti-platelet therapy combined with ASA, without increasing the risk of gastric bleeding.
机译:目的:本研究比较了常用的抗血小板药物(如氯吡格雷,噻氯匹定和西洛他唑)对由25 mM HC1(酸化的ASA)酸化的25 mM阿司匹林的腔内灌注诱导的胃出血和溃疡发生的反应。主要方法:在尿烷麻醉下以0.4 ml / min的速度用酸化的ASA灌注胃60分钟,并测量胃出血,以每15分钟收集一次的腔内灌注液中血红蛋白浓度为单位。口服给予氯吡格雷(10-100 mg / kg),噻氯匹定(10-300 mg / kg)或西洛他唑(3-30 mg / kg)。分别在灌注酸化的ASA前24小时或90分钟。主要发现:单独用酸化的ASA灌注胃会导致轻微的出血和胃部病变。用氯吡格雷进行的预处理,尽管它本身并不会引起出血或损害,但剂量依赖性地增加了酸化ASA诱导的胃出血和溃疡性反应。噻氯匹定还通过增加胃部出血而加重了损害的严重程度,噻氯匹定在300 mg / kg的作用与氯吡格雷在100 mg / kg的作用相当。与此相反,西洛他唑可剂量依赖性地减少酸化ASA引起的胃出血和胃损害。意义:这些结果表明,氯吡格雷和噻氯匹定,P2Y12受体抑制剂在相同程度上增加了胃出血和对酸化ASA的溃疡发生反应,而西洛他唑,磷酸二酯酶III抑制剂可抑制这些反应。因此,西洛他唑可以安全地用于与ASA联用的双重抗血小板治疗中,而不会增加胃出血的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号