首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Local history and landscape dynamics: A comparative study in rural Brazil and rural France
【24h】

Local history and landscape dynamics: A comparative study in rural Brazil and rural France

机译:当地历史和景观动态:巴西农村和法国农村的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In rural France as well as in rural Brazil, the years 1960-1970 were marked by profound socio-economic and environmental changes. In France, these changes were due to the agricultural modernization policy, in Brazil, they were caused mainly by the political integration of the Amazon to the rest of the country by infrastructure and agricultural colonization. The apparent irreversibility of the parallel phenomena of settlement, in France, and deforestation, in Brazil, gives us a comparative ground that this paper wishes to explore. We focused on four Brazilian protected areas and two French rural communes and studied the local attachment of the people and their collective attitude toward the environment. To do so, we assessed the main proximate factors identified in the literature, those determining the attitude of a human group toward its environment, an attitude influenced by structural drivers like legal issues and law enforcement. Our results suggest that these multiple factors are often randomly interconnected and can hardly be Modeled. Land use and cover change may be an interesting way to understand social and environmental change, if accompanied by qualitative research about environmental and social perceptions. Our main conclusion is that collective and individual choices are eventually framed by local history: we use the notion of, hysteresis to suggest that ancient causes may have enduring effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在法国农村以及巴西农村,1960-1970年都是社会经济和环境发生深刻变化的标志。在法国,这些变化是由于农业现代化政策所致;在巴西,这些变化主要是由于基础设施建设和农业殖民化,亚马逊与该国其他地区的政治整合所致。法国的定居与巴西的森林砍伐并行现象的明显不可逆转,为我们提供了本文希望探讨的比较基础。我们集中研究了四个巴西保护区和两个法国农村公社,研究了当地居民的依恋及其对环境的集体态度。为此,我们评估了文献中确定的主要邻近因素,这些因素决定了人类对环境的态度,这种态度受法律问题和执法等结构性驱动因素的影响。我们的结果表明,这些多个因素通常是随机互连的,很难建模。如果伴随着对环境和社会观念的定性研究,土地使用和覆被变化可能是理解社会和环境变化的有趣方式。我们的主要结论是,集体选择和个人选择最终都受到当地历史的限制:我们使用滞后的概念来暗示古老的原因可能具有持久的影响。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号