首页> 外文期刊>Landslides >A 36Cl age determination for Mystery Creek rock avalanche and its implications in the context of hazard assessment, British Columbia, Canada
【24h】

A 36Cl age determination for Mystery Creek rock avalanche and its implications in the context of hazard assessment, British Columbia, Canada

机译:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省,神秘河岩石雪崩的36Cl年龄确定及其对灾害评估的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Sea to Sky Corridor has experienced hundreds of historic and prehistoric landslides. The most common types of historical landslides are rock falls and debris flows, which are relatively small in volume but can be damaging. These types of failures are more common in the southern part of the corridor, between Horseshoe Bay and Porteau, where infrastructure has been built in close proximity to steep slopes. Farther north, fewer landslides have been reported historically, but those that have been recorded are usually large and date to prehistoric time (e. g., Cheekye fan and Mystery Creek rock avalanche). As part of a Geological Survey of Canada surficial geology and landslide inventory mapping study, Mystery Creek rock avalanche, near Whistler, British Columbia, was sampled for 36Cl dating. Samples were collected from three large flat boulders of quartz diorite in the rock avalanche deposit to test a correlation with the previously reported radiocarbon age of 800 ± 100 years BP on charcoal. One sample revealed a mean age of 2,400 years and the other two, 4,300 and 4,800 years, respectively. These new results point to four possible interpretations: (1) Mystery Creek landslide is about 800 years old; (2) Based on the overlapping 2σ uncertainties, the rock avalanche took place between 2,200 and 3,600 years ago; (3) The rock avalanche deposit is 2,400 years old and the other two blocks are too old; and (4) The rock avalanche is between 4,300 and 4,800 years old. Although there is strength in numbers and it is likely that the age varies between 4,300 and 4,800 years, we favor the second interpretation where the age range is broader and statistically significant for all three samples. Moreover, at this time, we favor discounting the radiocarbon age based on a greater number of samples analyzed for 36Cl analysis and lack of detailed information on the charcoal sampling. The causes and triggers of the Mystery Creek rock avalanche remain unknown, but direct glacial debuttressing can be ruled out. Some of the causes are likely a combination of the regional tectonic setting which produced preferential planes of weakness reflected in the trend of major faults, headscarp, and reverse scarps. Yearly cycles of freezing and thawing are considered a plausible cause based on present-day climate records. Finally, a large earthquake still remains a possible trigger because of the active tectonic setting and the presence of potentially contemporaneous landslides in the same area. Mystery Creek rock avalanche and other historic and pre-historic landslides contributed to validation of a heuristic rock fall/rock slide/rock avalanche susceptibility mapping study, in which their headscarps correlated well with medium-high to high susceptibility zones. In terms of hazard assessment, Mystery Creek rock avalanche, although pre-historic in age, occurred in present-day climatic and geological conditions. This poses a threat to infrastructure such as the Sea to Sky Highway, railway, and power line.
机译:海天走廊经历了数百次历史和史前滑坡。历史滑坡最常见的类型是落石和泥石流,它们的体积相对较小,但可能会造成破坏。这些类型的故障在走廊的南部,马蹄湾和波多之间更为常见,那里的基础设施已经建在陡峭的斜坡附近。在更远的北部,历史上已报道的滑坡较少,但已记录的滑坡通常较大且可追溯至史前时期(例如,奇奇叶扇和Mystery Creek岩石雪崩)。作为加拿大表面地质和滑坡清单测绘研究的一部分,对不列颠哥伦比亚省惠斯勒附近的Mystery Creek岩石雪崩进行了36Cl测年。从岩石雪崩矿床中的三个大的石英闪长石大扁石中收集样品,以测试与先前报道的木炭放射性碳年龄为800±100年BP的相关性。一个样本显示平均年龄为2400岁,另外两个样本分别为4300和4800岁。这些新结果指出了四种可能的解释:(1)Mystery Creek滑坡已有800多年的历史了; (2)基于重叠的2σ不确定性,岩石雪崩发生在2200到3600年前之间; (3)岩石雪崩矿床有2400年的历史,另外两个街区太老了; (4)岩石雪崩有4,300至4,800年的历史。尽管数字上有优势,年龄可能在4,300至4,800岁之间变化,但我们赞成第二种解释,即所有三个样本的年龄范围都更广且具有统计学意义。而且,这时,我们倾向于基于更多的36Cl分析样品样本以及缺乏有关木炭采样的详细信息来降低放射性碳的使用期限。 Mystery Creek岩石雪崩的成因和诱因仍然未知,但可以排除直接冰川初生的应力。一些原因可能是区域构造环境的组合,该区域构造产生了优先的软弱面,反映在主要断层,头皮和反向陡坡的趋势中。根据当今的气候记录,每年的冻融循环被认为是合理的原因。最后,由于活跃的构造环境以及同一地区可能同时发生的滑坡,大地震仍然可能是引发地震的原因。 Mystery Creek岩石雪崩以及其他历史和史前滑坡有助于验证启发式岩石跌落/岩石滑坡/岩石雪崩敏感性测绘研究,在该研究中,其头皮与中高至高敏感性区域具有良好的相关性。在危害评估方面,神秘河岩石雪崩虽然在历史上是有史以来的,但发生在当今的气候和地质条件下。这对基础设施构成了威胁,例如海天高速公路,铁路和电力线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号