首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Economic and environmental impacts of introducing land use policies and rotations on Prince Edward Island potato farms.
【24h】

Economic and environmental impacts of introducing land use policies and rotations on Prince Edward Island potato farms.

机译:在爱德华王子岛马铃薯农场实行土地使用政策和轮作制度对经济和环境的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 2002 Prince Edward Island (PEI) Agricultural Crop Rotations (ACR) Act and other sustainable land use policies regulate what crops can be grown in rotation with potatoes, and the frequency and sequence of specific crops in such rotation systems. Given that there are alternative crops that may be rotated with potatoes and managed for various rotation lengths, the policies raise questions about the economic and environmental implications of such land use policies and legislation on PEI potato-based agriculture. A multi-year linear programming model of a representative potato-based PEI farm was developed and then used to investigate the economic and environmental impacts of introducing various crop rotation systems and land use policy regulations specified under the PEI ACR Act. Results suggest that adoption of legislated rotation systems would lead to considerable reduction in gross margins. The extent of such financial losses increased as the frequency of potatoes in the rotations decreased (i.e., farm losses increased with rotation length). Both crop choice and sequence in a rotation influenced magnitude of the economic impacts of the land use and rotation legislation. For example, among 4-year rotations, gross margins for P-SC-B-RG (potato/silage corn/barley/ryegrass) were higher by $79, 955, when potatoes replaced silage corn in SC-SC-B-RG (silage corn/silage corn/barley/ryegrass). In addition, higher potato yields stemming from nutrient carry-over effects of particular crops (e.g., barley compared to spring wheat), did not necessarily translate into higher overall farm returns for the associated rotation. Economic-environmental trade-off frontier analysis suggest that different rotations generated varying levels of reduction in the use of agricultural chemicals, compared to benchmark production systems. However, environmental improvements associated with such reductions in chemical use required substantial reduction in gross margins to producers.
机译:2002年的爱德华王子岛(PEI)农业轮作法案(ACR)和其他可持续土地利用政策,规定了哪些轮作可以与马铃薯一起轮作,以及这种轮作系统中特定农作物的发生频率和顺序。鉴于有其他作物可以随马铃薯轮作并管理不同轮作长度,因此政策提出了有关土地使用政策和基于PEI马铃薯的农业立法的经济和环境影响的问题。建立了一个具有代表性的基于马铃薯的PEI农场的多年线性规划模型,然后将其用于研究引入PEI ACR法案规定的各种作物轮作系统和土地使用政策法规的经济和环境影响。结果表明,采用立法轮换制度将导致毛利率大幅度下降。这种经济损失的程度随着马铃薯轮作频率的降低而增加(即农场损失随着轮伐时间的增加而增加)。轮作的作物选择和顺序都会影响土地使用和轮作立法的经济影响的幅度。例如,在4年轮换中,当土豆代替SC-SC-B-RG中的青贮玉米时,P-SC-B-RG(马铃薯/青贮玉米/大麦/黑麦草)的毛利润增加了79,955美元。青贮玉米/青贮玉米/大麦/黑麦草)。此外,由于特定作物(例如大麦与春小麦相比)的营养结转效应,马铃薯单产较高,但未必会为相关轮作带来更高的总农场收益。经济与环境的权衡边界分析表明,与基准生产系统相比,不同的轮换产生了不同程度的农用化学品减少量。但是,与减少化学药品使用相关的环境改善要求生产商的毛利率大幅下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号