首页> 外文期刊>Landscape Ecology >Influence of marine reserve size and boundary length on the initial response of exploited reef fishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA
【24h】

Influence of marine reserve size and boundary length on the initial response of exploited reef fishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA

机译:美国佛罗里达礁岛国家海洋保护区的海洋保护区大小和边界长度对开发的礁鱼初始反应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examine the influence of reserve size and boundary length on the relative rate of fish density change in reserves versus fished reference reefs for three exploitable-sized reef fish categories: (1) combined fish (34 species of Haemulidae, Lutjanidae, Serranidae, and hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus); (2) Haemulidae (13 species); and (3) Lutjanidae (9 species). If reef habitat boundaries are highly permeable to fish movements then fish recovery within a reserve would be inversely proportional to: reserve perimeter (RP)/total reserve area (RA) (RP/RA). If, however, reef habitat boundaries are relatively impermeable barriers to fish movements, recovery within the reserve would be inversely proportional to: reserve boundary that intersects reef habitat (HI)/reef habitat area within the reserve (HA) (HI/HA). From 1994 to 2001 we monitored reef fishes within and outside of no-take marine reserves established in 1997 in the Florida Keys, USA. A significant majority of reserves had greater rates of density change than reference reefs for Lutjanidae and combined fish (22 of 24 reserves for both categories). Significantly higher rates of density change were found in ten reserves for Lutjanidae, two reserves for combined fish, and one reserve for Haemulidae. Reserves appeared to promote an increased density of exploitable fishes. A significant, negative, but weakly correlated relationship was found between the relative rate of density change (RDC) for combined fish and the HI/HA ratio. Reserve size and placement appeared to have a minimal effect upon RDC.
机译:我们研究了三种可利用大小的珊瑚礁鱼类类别的保护区大小和边界长度对保护区鱼类密度相对于参考礁石相对密度的影响:(1)混养鱼(34种e科(Haemulidae,Lutjanidae,Serranidae和hogfish) Lachnolaimus maximus); (2)e科(13种); (3)Lutjanidae(9种)。如果珊瑚礁的栖息地边界对鱼类运动具有很高的渗透性,那么保护区内的鱼类恢复将与以下因素成反比:保护区周长(RP)/总保护区面积(RA)(RP / RA)。但是,如果礁石栖息地边界是鱼类运动的相对不可渗透的障碍,则保护区内的恢复将与以下成反比:与保护区内的礁石栖息地(HI)/保护区内的礁石栖息地面积(HI)相交的保护区边界(HI / HA)。从1994年到2001年,我们监测了1997年在美国佛罗里达礁岛建立的禁止捕捞海洋保护区内外的珊瑚礁鱼类。大部分的储藏区的密度变化率高于路特科(Lutjanidae)和混养鱼类的参考礁(两个类别的24个储集区中的22个)。在Lutjanidae的十个保护区,两个鱼类组合的保护区和Haemulidae的一个保护区中发现了更高的密度变化率。储备似乎促进了可利用鱼类密度的增加。在混合鱼的相对密度变化率(RDC)与HI / HA比之间发现了显着的负相关但微弱相关的关系。储备金的大小和位置似乎对RDC的影响最小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号