首页> 外文期刊>Land Economics >The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments

机译:养护金的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

International donors invest billions of dollars to conserve ecosystems in low income nations. The most common investments aim to encourage commercial activities, such as ecotourism, that indirectly generate ecosystem protection as a joint product. We demonstrate that paying for ecosystem protection directly can be far more cost-effective. Although direct payment initiatives have imposing institutional requirements, we argue that all conservation initiatives face similar challenges. Thus conservation practitioners would be well advised to implement the first-best direct payment approach, rather than a second best policy option. An empirical example from the eastern rain forests of Madagascar from 1991-95 illustrates the spectacular cost savings that can be realized by direct payment initiatives.
机译:国际捐助者投资了数十亿美元来保护低收入国家的生态系统。最常见的投资旨在鼓励商业活动,例如生态旅游,这种商业活动间接地将生态系统保护作为一种联合产品。我们证明,直接为生态系统保护付费可以更具成本效益。尽管直接支付计划有一定的制度要求,但我们认为所有保护计划都面临类似的挑战。因此,建议养护从业人员实施最佳的直接支付方式,而不是第二好的政策选择。 1991-95年马达加斯加东部雨林的经验例子表明,通过直接付款计划可以节省大量成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号