首页> 外文期刊>Land Degradation and Development >Cropping strategies, soil fertility investment and land management practices by smallholder farmers in communal and resettlement areas in Zimbabwe
【24h】

Cropping strategies, soil fertility investment and land management practices by smallholder farmers in communal and resettlement areas in Zimbabwe

机译:津巴布韦公共和安置区小农户的种植策略,土壤肥力投资和土地管理做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three smallholder villages located in typical communal (from 1948), old (1987) and new (2002) resettlement areas, on loamy sand, sandy loam and clay soils, respectively, were selected to explore differences on natural resource management and land productivity. Focus group discussions and surveys were carried out with farmers. Additionally, farmers in three wealth classes per village were chosen for a detailed assessment of their main production systems. Maize grain yields (t hap#) in the communal (1p"5-4p"0) and new resettlement areas (1p"9-4p"3) were similar but significantly higher than in the old resettlement area (0p"9-2p"7), despite lower soil quality in the communal area. Nutrient input use was the main factor controlling maize productivity in the three areas (Rpo = 59-83%), while soil quality accounted for up to 12%. Partial N balances (kg hap# yrp#) were significantly lower in the new resettlement (-9p"1 to +14p"3) and old resettlement (+7p"4 to +9p"6) than in the communal area (+2p"1 to +59p"6) due to lower nutrient applications. Averaged P balances were usually negative. Consistently, maize yields, nutrient applications and partial N balances were higher in the high wealth class than in poorer classes. This study found that most farmers in the new resettlement area were exploiting the inherent soil nutrient stocks more than farmers in the other two areas. We argue that effective policies supporting an efficient fertilizer distribution and improved soil management practices, with clearer rights to land, are necessary to avoid future land degradation and to improve food security in Zimbabwe, particularly in the resettlement areas. Copyright pb 2009 John Wiley '' Sons, Ltd.
机译:选择了三个典型的小农村,分别位于典型的社区(自1948年起),旧的(1987年)和新的(2002年)安置区,分别位于壤质砂土,沙质壤土和黏土上,以探讨自然资源管理和土地生产力的差异。与农民进行了焦点小组讨论和调查。此外,还选择了每个村庄三个财富类别的农民,以对其主要生产系统进行详细评估。社区(1p“ 5-4p” 0)和新移民区(1p“ 9-4p” 3)的玉米单产(t hap#)相似,但明显高于旧移民区(0p” 9-2p) “ 7)尽管公共区域的土壤质量较低。在三个地区(Rpo = 59-83%),养分投入的使用是控制玉米生产力的主要因素,而土壤质量占12%。在新移民(-9p“ 1至+ 14p” 3)和旧移民(+ 7p“ 4至+ 9p” 6)中,部分N余额(kg hap#yrp#)显着低于公共区域(+ 2p “ 1至+ 59p” 6)归因于较低的养分施用。平均P余额通常为负。一致地,高收入阶层的玉米产量,养分施用和部分氮平衡高于贫困阶层。这项研究发现,新移民区的大多数农民比其他两个地区的农民更多地利用土壤固有的养分资源。我们认为,有必要采取有效的政策来支持有效的肥料分配和改善的土壤管理做法,并拥有更明确的土地权利,以避免津巴布韦未来土地退化和改善粮食安全,特别是在安置区。版权所有pb 2009 John Wiley''Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号