首页> 外文期刊>Leprosy review >Combining peer-led self-care interventions for people affected by leprosy or diabetes in leprosy-endemic countries. What do health care professionals think?
【24h】

Combining peer-led self-care interventions for people affected by leprosy or diabetes in leprosy-endemic countries. What do health care professionals think?

机译:在麻风病流行国家,结合由同行领导的自我护理干预措施,为受麻风病或糖尿病影响的人们提供服务。卫生保健专业人员怎么看?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Leprosy is slowly decreasing in incidence whereas diabetes is a growing health concern. Despite differences in aetiology, both diseases may lead to peripheral neuropathy and subsequent injuries and permanent impairments. There are also indications of similarities in psychosocial consequences. Prevention of Disability (POD) and self-management are often recommended for both diseases. This led to the idea of exploring the feasibility of combined peer-led self-care interventions for people with these disorders. To explore the opinions of health care professionals about combining peer-led self-care interventions for people affected by leprosy or diabetes in leprosy-endemic countries. An exploratory study was conducted to collect quantitative data by means of an e-questionnaire and qualitative data through in-depth semi-structured interviews with key informants. In total, 227 respondents answered the e-questionnaire and 22 in-depth interviews were conducted. Resemblances in physical complications between leprosy and diabetes were confirmed by the respondents. Psychosocial similarities included limitations in daily activity and in social participation, but stigma in leprosy was thought to be an important difference. Considerable overlap in current practices was found, mainly in patient education in POD, skin assessment and skin care, and the recommendation to use protective footwear. Knowledge exchange between leprosy and diabetes specialists is limited, although combined interventions were reported. The majority of respondents think that combined interventions are 'possible' (33.3%) or 'possible and promising' (30.8%). Professionals working with both diseases are more positive than those working with leprosy or diabetes only. The greatest barriers for combined interventions are perceived to be leprosy-related stigma, differences in underlying socio-economic status, attitudes of health care professionals and the current organization of health care systems. Responses indicate perspectives for combined interventions for the prevention of disabilities. For this, it is essential to intensify knowledge exchange between leprosy and diabetes professionals, to overcome barriers and to secure government policy support. Opportunities should be assessed in a situation-specific way.
机译:麻风病的发病率正在缓慢下降,而糖尿病是一个日益严重的健康问题。尽管病因学上存在差异,但两种疾病均可能导致周围神经病变以及随后的伤害和永久性损伤。也有社会心理后果相似的迹象。对于这两种疾病,通常都建议预防残疾(POD)和自我管理。这导致了一个想法,即探索由同行领导的自我护理干预措施联合用于这些疾病患者的可行性。探索医疗保健专业人员关于在麻风病流行国家结合由同行领导的针对麻风病或糖尿病患者的自我保健干预措施的意见。进行了一项探索性研究,以通过电子问卷调查和定量数据的方式,通过对主要信息提供者的深入半结构化访谈来收集定量数据。总共227位受访者回答了电子问卷,并进行了22次深度访谈。受访者确认麻风病和糖尿病之间的身体并发症相似。社会心理方面的相似之处包括日常活动和社交参与方面的限制,但麻风病中的耻辱感被认为是重要的差异。在当前的实践中发现了很多重叠之处,主要是在POD,皮肤评估和皮肤护理方面的患者教育以及建议使用防护鞋。麻风病和糖尿病专家之间的知识交流是有限的,尽管据报道有综合干预措施。大多数受访者认为联合干预是“可能的”(33.3%)或“可能的和有希望的”(30.8%)。处理这两种疾病的专业人员比仅治疗麻风病或糖尿病的专业人员更为积极。联合干预的最大障碍被认为是与麻风病相关的污名,基本社会经济地位的差异,卫生保健专业人员的态度以及卫生保健系统的当前组织。答复表明了采取综合干预措施预防残疾的观点。为此,必须加强麻风病和糖尿病专业人士之间的知识交流,克服障碍并获得政府政策支持。应根据具体情况评估机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号