...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems >Effect of planting technique and amendment type on pearl millet yield,nutrient uptake,and water use on degraded land in Niger
【24h】

Effect of planting technique and amendment type on pearl millet yield,nutrient uptake,and water use on degraded land in Niger

机译:种植技术和改良剂类型对尼日尔退化土地上珍珠小米产量,养分吸收和水分利用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to increased population pressure and limited availability of fertile land,farmers on desert fringes increasingly rely on marginal land for agricultural production,which they have learned to rehabilitate with different technologies for soils and water conservation.One such method is the indigenous zai technique used in the Sahel.It combines water harvesting and targeted application of organic amendments by the use of small pits dug into the hardened soil.To study the resource use efficiency of this technique,experiments were conducted 1999-2000,on-station at ICRISAT in Niger,and on-farm at two locations on degraded lands.On-station,the effect of application rate of millet straw and cattle manure on millet dry matter production was studied.On-farm,the effects of organic amendment type(millet straw and cattle manure,at the rate of 300 g per plant)and water harvesting(with and without water harvesting)on millet grain yield,dry matter production,and water use were studied.First,the comparison of zai vs.flat planting,both unamended,resulted in a 3-to 4-fold(in one case,even 19-fold)increase in grain yield on-farm in both years,which points to the yield effects of improved water harvesting in the zai alone.Zai improved the water use efficiency by a factor of about 2.The yields increased further with the application of organic amendments.Manure resulted in 2-68 times better grain yields than no amendment and 2-7 times better grain yields than millet straw(higher on the more degraded soils).Millet dry matter produced per unit of manure N or K was higher than that of millet straw,a tendency that was similar for all rates of application.Zai improved nutrient uptake in the range of 43-64% for N,50-87% for P and 58-66% for K.Zai increased grain yield produced per unit N(8 vs.5 kg kg~(-1))and K(10 vs.6 kg kg~(-1))compared to flat;so is the effect of cattle manure compared to millet straw(9 vs.4 kg kg~(-1),and 14 vs.3 kg kg~(-1)),respectively,Therefore zai shows a good potential for increasing agronomic efficiency and nutrient use efficiency.Increasing the rate of cattle manure application from 1 to 3 t ha~(-1)increased the yield by 115% TDM,but increasing the manure application rate further from 3 to 5 t ha~(-1)only gave an additional 12% yield increase,which shows that optimum application rates are around 3t ha~(-1).
机译:由于人口压力的增加和肥沃土地的供应有限,沙漠边缘地区的农民越来越多地依靠边际土地进行农业生产,他们学会了利用不同的水土保持技术进行修复。它结合了集水和有针对性地应用有机改良剂的方法,方法是使用在坚硬的土壤中挖出的小坑。为了研究该技术的资源利用效率,1999-2000年在尼日尔的ICRISAT进行了实验,在农田上,研究了秸秆和牛粪的施用量对小米干物质生产的影响。在农场,有机修饰类型(粟秸秆和牛粪)的影响以每株300 g的产量)和集水量(有或没有集水量)对小米籽粒产量,干物质生产和水分利用的影响进行了研究。枣与平整种植的无期徒刑,两者均未修正,导致两年内农场的谷物产量增加了3到4倍(在一种情况下,甚至是19倍),这表明改良水的产量效果仅在采ai区进行采收,Z将水分利用效率提高了约2倍。使用有机改良剂后,产量进一步提高.Manure的产量比未改良的改良了2-68倍,谷物提高了2-7倍产量比小米秸秆高(在退化程度更高的土壤上更高)。每单位肥料N或K产生的小米干物质高于小米秸秆,在所有施用量下这种趋势都相似.Zai在该范围内提高了养分吸收氮的磷含量为43-64%,磷的钾含量为50-87%,钾的钾含量为58-66%.Zai增加了每单位N(8 vs.5 kg kg〜(-1))和K(10 vs.6 kg公斤〜(-1))相比持平;牛粪的效果与小米秸秆相比(9 vs. 4 kg kg〜(-1),14 vs.3 kg kg〜(-1)),因此,zai显示出良好的潜力牛粪施用量从1增加到3 t ha〜(-1)使产量提高115%TDM,但粪肥施用量又从3增加到5 t ha〜 (-1)仅使产量增加了12%,这表明最佳施用量约为3t ha〜(-1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号