首页> 外文期刊>Noise & vibration bulletin >COMPARISON OF MICROPHONE ARRAY PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR AEROACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF MICROPHONE ARRAY PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR AEROACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS

机译:航空声学测量中麦克风阵列处理技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a systematic comparison of several prominent beamforming algorithms developed for aeroacoustic measurements. The most widely used delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer is known to suffer from high sidelobe level and low resolution problems. Therefore, more advanced methods, in particular the deconvolution approach for the mapping of acoustic sources (DAMAS), sparsity constrained DAMAS (SC-DAMAS), covariance matrix fitting (CMF) and CLEAN based on spatial source coherence (CLEAN-SC) have been considered to achieve improved resolution and more accurate signal power estimates. The performances of the aforementioned algorithms are evaluated via experiments involving a 63-element logarithmic spiral microphone array in the presence of a single source, two incoherent sources with similar strengths and with different strengths, and two coherent sources. It is observed that DAMAS, SCDAMAS and CMF provide the most reliable source location estimates, even at relatively low frequencies. Furthermore the integrated levels obtained with the array processing algorithms are shown to agree with what a single reference microphone placed at the center of the array measures when the array is appropriately calibrated. It is also shown that, as expected, the aforementioned algorithms are unsuccessful in distinguishing coherent acoustic sources unless the frequency is relatively high. DAS and CLEAN-SC are shown to be around 2 to 90 times faster than the other three algorithms.
机译:本文介绍了针对航空声学测量开发的几种著名波束成形算法的系统比较。众所周知,使用最广泛的延迟与和(DAS)波束形成器会遭受高旁瓣电平和低分辨率问题的困扰。因此,已经有了更先进的方法,特别是用于基于声源映射(DAMAS),稀疏约束DAMAS(SC-DAMAS),协方差矩阵拟合(CMF)和基于空间源相干性(CLEAN-SC)的CLEAN的反卷积方法。被认为可以实现更高的分辨率和更准确的信号功率估计。通过在单个信号源,两个强度相似且强度不同的非相干信号源和两个相干信号源的情况下,对涉及63个元素的对数螺旋麦克风阵列进行实验,评估了上述算法的性能。可以看出,即使在相对较低的频率下,DAMAS,SCDAMAS和CMF也提供了最可靠的源位置估计。此外,示出了用阵列处理算法获得的积分水平与当适当地校准阵列时放置在阵列中心的单个参考麦克风所测量的一致。还表明,正如预期的那样,除非频率相对较高,否则上述算法在区分相干声源方面是不成功的。 DAS和CLEAN-SC被证明比其他三种算法快2到90倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号