...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular therapeutics >Long-term survival of routine implantable cardioverter/defibrillator recipients appears to be significantly impaired with concomitant diuretics and improved with aldosterone antagonists.
【24h】

Long-term survival of routine implantable cardioverter/defibrillator recipients appears to be significantly impaired with concomitant diuretics and improved with aldosterone antagonists.

机译:常规的植入式心脏复律器/除颤器接受者的长期生存似乎伴随着利尿剂的出现而受到了明显的损害,而醛固酮拮抗剂的改善了。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evidence-based treatment for heart failure (HF) comprises beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARA). Diuretics (DR) are prescribed in acute and chronic HF, but their impact on survival and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) is unclear. The present observational study aims to examine the influence of DR and ARA on survival and appropriate cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) treatment episodes in routine ICD patients. In 352 consecutive ICD patients (291 men, 60 +/- 12 years, LVEF 34 +/- 15%, follow-up 37 +/- 19 months) overall survival and the time to a first appropriate VT/VF episode were assessed. Electrograms were validated. Potassium and creatinine serum levels and the medical treatment regimen for heart failure were documented at baseline. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed significantly worse survival for patients with DR compared to those without DR (OR 0.24, CI 0.08-0.76, P= 0.016), whereas the group with ARA had better survival compared to patients without (OR 2.05, CI 1.02-4.10, P= 0.04). Patient groups did not differ regarding survival without incident VT/VF (DR+ vs. DR- OR 1.10, CI 0.67-1.83, P= 0.70; OR 0.66, CI 0.40-1.09, P= 0.10). Long-term survival appears to be compromised in ICD patients receiving concomitant DR, but is favorably influenced by ARA, although VT/VF incidence does not differ. Randomized analyses are warranted to assess long-term prognostic effects of DR in HF.
机译:心力衰竭(HF)的循证治疗包括β受体阻滞剂,血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和醛固酮受体拮抗剂(ARA)。在急性和慢性心力衰竭中均使用利尿剂(DR),但尚不清楚其对生存率和室性快速性心律失常(VT / VF)的影响。本观察性研究旨在检查DR和ARA对常规ICD患者生存率和适当的心脏复律/除颤器(ICD)治疗发作的影响。在352名连续的ICD患者(291名男性,60 +/- 12岁,LVEF 34 +/- 15%,随访37 +/- 19个月)中,评估了总生存期和首次发生适当的VT / VF发作的时间。电描记图已验证。基线记录了钾和肌酐的血清水平以及心力衰竭的治疗方案。多元Cox回归分析显示,DR患者的生存率显着低于无DR患者(OR 0.24,CI 0.08-0.76,P = 0.016),而ARA组的生存率高于无DR患者(OR 2.05,CI 1.02- 4.10,P = 0.04)。患者组在没有发生VT / VF的情况下生存率没有差异(DR + vs. DR-OR 1.10,CI 0.67-1.83,P = 0.70; OR 0.66,CI 0.40-1.09,P = 0.10)。尽管VT / VF的发生率没有差异,但接受DR的ICD患者的长期生存似乎受到了影响,但受到ARA的有利影响。有必要进行随机分析以评估DR对HF的长期预后影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号