...
【24h】

Presidential Choices

机译:总统选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Which presidential candidate will be best for US manufacturing? Issues to consider before voting November 4th. Neither Senator Obama nor Senator McCain has placed a high emphasis on manufacturing. Neither home page lists "manufacturing" as an issue even though one or both list: "immigration," "border security," "rural," and "urban policy." Senator Obama's nomination speech word count was: healthcare, six; energy, three; immigration, one; and manufacturing, zero. A word count for "manufacturing" on the two Web sites showed Obama with six and McCain zero, perhaps because Senator Obama has proposed many more plans than has Senator McCain. Neither man seems to realize that only a strong manufacturing sector can drive enough growth in the rest of the economy to pay for their other plans to both spend/cut taxes and balance the budget. Nevertheless, the sum of their actions and omissions can and will significantly impact US manufacturing.
机译:哪位总统候选人最适合美国制造业? 11月4日投票前要考虑的问题。奥巴马参议员和麦凯恩参议员都没有高度重视制造业。即使将“移民”,“边境安全”,“农村”和“城市政策”中的一个或两个都列出,两个主页都没有将“制造”列为问题。奥巴马参议员的提名演说词数是:医疗保健,六个;能量三;移民;和制造业,零。在这两个网站上“制造”的字数显示,奥巴马为六,麦凯恩为零,这可能是因为奥巴马参议员提出的计划比麦凯恩参议员要多得多。似乎没有人意识到只有强大的制造业才能带动其他经济体的足够增长,以支付他们用于支出/削减税收和平衡预算的其他计划。尽管如此,它们的作为和不作为总和会并且将极大地影响美国的制造业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号