首页> 外文期刊>Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids >Foam destruction by mixed solid-liquid antifoams in solutions of alkyl glucoside:electrostatic interactions and dynamic effects
【24h】

Foam destruction by mixed solid-liquid antifoams in solutions of alkyl glucoside:electrostatic interactions and dynamic effects

机译:烷基糖苷溶液中固液混合消泡剂对泡沫的破坏:静电相互作用和动力学效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Antifoam substances are used in various technologies and commercial products to prevent the formation of undesirable foam. A typical problem in their application is that an antifoam that is rather active in a given surfactant solution might be very inefficient for other foaming media at comparable conditions. The reasons for this high antifoam selectivity to the used surfactant are still poorly understood. To gain a new insight into this problem, we compare the mechanisms of foam destruction by several antifoams for two surfactants: the nonionic alkyl-C1a,,4(glucopiranoside),2 (APG) and the anionic sodium dioctyl-sulfosuccinate (AOT). Foam tests demonstrate significant differences in the antifoam activity for these two surfactants, although their entry, spreading, and bridging coefficients are very similar. One interesting feature is that the antifoams destroy APG-stabilized foams only under dynamic conditions (during shaking); the foam that “survives” the first several seconds after ceasing the agitation remains stable for many hours. In contrast, most of the studied antifoams destroy rapidly and completely the AOT-stabilized foams without external agitation. In general, the foams produced from APG solutions are significantly more stable. Additional model experiments show that the observed differences can be explained by three simple effects:(1) the kinetics of surfactant adsorption on the air—water and oil—water interfaces is much slower in APG solutions; (2) the barrier to entry of the antifoam globules is much higher for APG; (3) the films stabilized by APG are much thicker and more resistant to rupture by the antifoam globules. One surprising conclusion is that the electrostatic interaction between the charged air—water and oil—water interfaces is extremely important in solutions of the nonionic surfactant APG.
机译:消泡剂物质用于各种技术和商业产品中,以防止形成不良的泡沫。在其应用中的典型问题是,在给定的表面活性剂溶液中相当有效的消泡剂在相当的条件下对于其他发泡介质可能效率很低。对于所使用的表面活性剂如此高的消泡剂选择性的原因仍知之甚少。为了获得对该问题的新见解,我们比较了几种表面活性剂的消泡剂破坏泡沫的机理:两种表面活性剂:非离子烷基-C1a ,, 4(葡糖吡喃糖苷),2(APG)和阴离子二辛基磺基琥珀酸钠(AOT)。泡沫测试表明,这两种表面活性剂的消泡活性存在显着差异,尽管它们的进入,扩散和桥连系数非常相似。一个有趣的特征是,消泡剂仅在动态条件下(在摇动过程中)才能破坏APG稳定的泡沫。停止搅拌后最初几秒钟“存活”的泡沫可保持稳定数小时。相反,大多数研究的消泡剂在没有外部搅动的情况下迅速,完全地破坏了AOT稳定的泡沫。通常,由APG溶液生产的泡沫明显更稳定。额外的模型实验表明,观察到的差异可以用三个简单的效应来解释:(1)在APG溶液中,表面活性剂在空气-水和油-水界面上的吸附动力学要慢得多; (2)对于APG,消泡剂小球的进入障碍要高得多; (3)APG稳定的薄膜更厚,并且更能抵抗消泡剂小球的破裂。一个令人惊讶的结论是,在非离子表面活性剂APG的溶液中,空气-水和油-水界面之间的静电相互作用极为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号