首页> 外文期刊>journal of clinical and diagnostic research >A Comparative Study of the Results of the Anatomic Medial Portal and All Inside Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
【24h】

A Comparative Study of the Results of the Anatomic Medial Portal and All Inside Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction

机译:解剖内侧门和所有关节镜前交叉韧带重建结果的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: Many techniques of graft placement in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is available now-a-days, like trans-tibial, anatomical accessory medial portal and anatomical all-inside technique.Aim: To compare the improvement in clinical status of patients treated by anatomic accessory medial portal and all-inside arthroscopic ACL reconstruction technique pre-operatively post-operatively using International Knee Documentation Comittee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Scores, Lysholm Knee Score, Knee Society Score, Lachman test, Visual Analog Score (VAS) in both the groups.Materials and Methods: After informed consent from patients and clearance from Ethical Committee, we included patients aged 18 to 50 years with ACL injury and clinical laxity admitted in Department of Orthopaedics, King George Medical University, Lucknow. We included 100 patients in the study, which were divided into two groups, Group1 comprised of patients treated by Anatomic accessory medial portal technique and group 2 comprised of patients treated by All-Inside technique. Then the patients were followed up post-operatively at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months, clinically for functional status using Lysholm Knee Score, IKDC Subjective Knee Score, Knee Society Score and VAS score. Grading of laxity was evaluated by Lachman test at pre-operative stage and 6 months follow-up. After collection of the data, analysis was carried out on SPSS software version 16.0 (Chicago, inc. USA) and the statistical test that was used was 2-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).Results: IKDC Subjective Knee Score, Lysholm Knee Score, Knee Society Score, Lachman Test and VAS Score was better in group 2 treated by All-inside technique as compared to group1 and the difference was significant (p<0.005).Conclusion: All- Inside arthroscopic ACL reconstruction technique (group2) is a better technique than arthroscopic Anatomic accessory medial portal technique (group1).
机译:简介:关节镜前交叉韧带 (ACL) 重建中的许多移植物放置技术现在可用,例如经胫骨、解剖附件内侧门户和解剖学全内部技术。目的:比较使用国际膝关节文献委员会 (IKDC) 主观膝关节评分、Lysholm 膝关节评分、膝关节协会评分、Lachman 测试、视觉模拟评分 (VAS) 在术前接受解剖辅助内侧门静脉和全内部关节镜 ACL 重建技术治疗的患者的临床状态改善在两组中。材料和方法:在获得患者知情同意和伦理委员会批准后,我们纳入了勒克瑙乔治国王医科大学骨科收治的 18 至 50 岁 ACL 损伤和临床松弛患者。我们在研究中纳入了 100 名患者,分为两组,第 1 组由接受解剖辅助内侧门静脉技术治疗的患者组成,第 2 组由接受 All-Inside 技术治疗的患者组成。然后,在术后 6 周、12 周和 6 个月对患者进行随访,使用 Lysholm 膝关节评分、IKDC 主观膝关节评分、膝关节协会评分和 VAS 评分进行临床功能状态随访。在术前阶段和 6 个月的随访中通过 Lachman 试验评估松弛的分级。收集数据后,对SPSS软件版本16.0(Chicago, inc.USA),使用的统计检验是 2 因素方差分析 (ANOVA)。结果:与第1组相比,全内技术治疗的第2组IKDC主观膝关节评分、Lysholm膝关节评分、膝关节协会评分、Lachman检验和VAS评分均优于第1组,差异显著(p<0.005)。结论:全关节镜前交叉韧带重建技术(第2组)是比关节镜解剖辅助内侧门静脉技术(第1组)更好的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号