首页> 外文期刊>Laboratory Animal Science >COMPARISON OF THE PULMONARY DISTRIBUTION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIBODIES GIVEN TO MICE BY INTRATRACHEAL INSTILLATION OR AEROSOL INHALATION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE PULMONARY DISTRIBUTION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIBODIES GIVEN TO MICE BY INTRATRACHEAL INSTILLATION OR AEROSOL INHALATION

机译:气管内插管或气雾剂吸入给小鼠的抗原的肺分配和功效的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The respiratory tract is the portal of entry and target organ of many aerosolized toxins and infective agents, and there is increasing need for testing the efficacy of potential therapeutic agents delivered directly into the lungs, Intratracheal instillation and aerosol inhalation are the two methods most often used to introduce drugs, toxins, or infective agents into the respiratory tract of experimental animals, In this study we compared the distribution and efficacy of antibodies given to mice by aerosol inhalation or intratracheal instillation. We determined the pulmonary distribution of these antibodies by immunohistochemistry and observed the distribution and severity of pulmonary lesions that developed after exposure to aerosolized ricin, Although antibodies administered by either method prevented death, we found that instilled antibodies tended to concentrate around terminal airways and often failed to reach peripheral lung fields. Sometimes entire lung lobes were missed by the instillation route, Acute and chronic pulmonary lesions developed in the unprotected areas of instillation-treated lungs, in contrast, aerosolized antibodies covered all pulmonary surfaces and effectively prevented ricin-induced lesions throughout the lungs, Our findings suggest that the aerosol inhalation method may be preferable for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents in the respiratory tract because of the failure of instilled agents to reach and protect peripheral alveoli.
机译:呼吸道是许多气雾化毒素和感染剂的进入和目标器官的入口,并且越来越需要测试直接输送到肺中的潜在治疗剂的功效,气管内滴注和气雾剂吸入是最常用的两种方法为了将药物,毒素或感染剂引入实验动物的呼吸道,在这项研究中,我们比较了通过气雾吸入或气管内滴注给予小鼠的抗体的分布和功效。我们通过免疫组织化学测定了这些抗体的肺部分布,并观察了暴露于雾化蓖麻毒蛋白后形成的肺部病变的分布和严重程度。尽管通过这两种方法施用的抗体均能预防死亡,但我们发现滴注的抗体倾向于集中在终末气道周围,并且常常失败到达周围的肺野。有时,滴注途径会漏掉整个肺叶,在滴注治疗的肺部未保护的区域中会形成急性和慢性肺部病变,相比之下,雾化的抗体覆盖了所有肺部表面,并有效预防了蓖麻毒素诱导的整个肺部病变认为气雾吸入法可能更可用于评估治疗剂在呼吸道中的功效,因为滴入的药剂无法到达并保护周围的肺泡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号