...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Ecological outcomes of civic and expert-led urban greening projects using indigenous plant species in Cape Town, South Africa
【24h】

Ecological outcomes of civic and expert-led urban greening projects using indigenous plant species in Cape Town, South Africa

机译:南非开普敦使用本地植物物种进行的公民和专家主导的城市绿化项目的生态成果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Parks and private and public gardens do not exist in isolation, but form part of the urban fabric, contributing to ecological functioning. There is growing interest in how civil society shapes urban ecologies and vegetation patterns. This paper explores the ecological outcomes of a series of indigenous plant greening interventions in Cape Town. The six different sites were sampled: two civic-led intervention sites, one expert-led rehabilitation site, two conservation sites and one abandoned site. These sites are compared in terms of their plant and insect diversity and then discussed in relation to their contingent management arrangements and in relation to conservation and abandoned land. Plant and insect diversity measured at the civic-led greening intervention sites suggest these sites are similar to adjacent conservation sites, while floristic composition differs. The inclusion of a vacant lot with poor species and growth form diversity shows the significant role of intervention in the ecological reformation of urban green space. By emphasizing the ecological outcomes, this study highlights the importance of civil society in linking conservation goals to more broad-based notions of quality of life and the 'good and just city'. Our results indicate that civic-led efforts warrant attention in keeping with those of experts, both in relation to meeting indigenous conservation targets, as well as supporting functional groups and wider ecological processes, with the acknowledged exception of fire. How to integrate such civic-led interventions into urban biodiversity management planning is still an open question
机译:公园,私人花园和公共花园并不是孤立存在的,而是构成城市结构的一部分,有助于生态功能。人们对公民社会如何塑造城市生态和植被格局越来越感兴趣。本文探讨了开普敦一系列本土植物绿化干预措施的生态结果。对六个不同的地点进行了采样:两个由公民主导的干预场所,一个由专家主导的康复场所,两个保护场所和一个废弃场所。对这些地点的植物和昆虫多样性进行了比较,然后就其临时管理安排以及保护和废弃土地进行了讨论。在市民主导的绿化干预点测得的植物和昆虫多样性表明,这些点与邻近的保护点相似,而植物区系不同。包括一个物种贫乏且生长形式多样的空地,表明干预在城市绿地生态改革中的重要作用。通过强调生态结果,本研究强调了公民社会在将保护目标与生活质量和“美好而公正的城市”等更为广泛的观念联系起来的重要性。我们的结果表明,在公认的火灾方面,公民主导的努力与专家的努力值得关注,既要达到土著保护目标,也要支持职能团体和更广泛的生态过程。如何将这种由公民主导的干预措施纳入城市生物多样性管理规划仍是一个悬而未决的问题

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号